this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
263 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

70215 readers
3619 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Absolutely needed: to get high efficiency for this beast ... as it gets better, we'll become too dependent.

"all of this growth is for a new technology that’s still finding its footing, and in many applications—education, medical advice, legal analysis—might be the wrong tool for the job,,,"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

Solar powered server farms in space. Self-powered, self-cooling, 'outside the environment'. Is this a stupid idea?

Edit: So it would seem the answer is yes. Good chat :) Thanks.

[–] el_bhm@lemm.ee 25 points 1 day ago

Launch cost is astronomical.

Maintenance access is horrible.

Temperature delta is insane, upto 250C.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t understand the self-cooling. Isn’t it harder to keep things cool in space since there is no conduction or convection cooling? I mean everything is in a vacuum. The only place for heat to go is radiative and that’s terribly inefficient. Seems like a massive engineering problem.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is, infrared radiators weight a shit ton and are inefficient, big and unwieldy. Still the only viable option for cooling in space. AI would take an hugemongous square footage of it just so the GPUs won't melt.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago
[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You can cool servers way better on Earth than you can in space. Down here you can transfer heat away from the server with conduction and convection, but in space you really only have radiation. Cooling spacecraft is an engineering challenge. One might imagine a server stuck inside a glass thermos that's sitting out in the sun.

[–] Gibibit@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Afaik space isn't self cooling. Overheating of spacecraft is a thing. I think they can only cool through infrared radiation or something.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If the end goal is so little Timmy can ask a robot if nazis exist and it spits out misinformation or so Ai bots can flood social media with endless regurgitated bullshit, then no, it's just more garbage in space.

Ai is interesting,... necessary? A lot of people can be fed and housed for the cost of giant, experimental solar powered Ai computers in space so that they have more excuses not to pay people a living wage.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When I think about the potential of AI, I like to think of Iain M. Banks' Culture more than Skynet. We could probably all live in a post-scarcity society even without AI if we put our minds into it, but let's free ourselves of unnecessary or unwilling labour while we're at it, eh?

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm glad someone's hopeful. Any time I see a new technology, I wonder what the worst possible outcome could be, and it usually makes it there.

Sorry, I just have zero faith in humanity.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 17 hours ago

Oh, I have zero expectation of an actual positive outcome. I don't think the tech-bros read. Or think ahead.

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

Do you know how much energy you need to launch a kilogram into Earth orbit?

[–] Emi@ani.social 3 points 1 day ago

I assume yes, I know very little but I know space is very hard and harsh environment. Also it would be very expensive I assume. And it would need to be big.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 hours ago

very stupid. One of the most difficult things in space is cooling stuff. Sending up a bunch of space heaters in a box (almost all of the energy pumped into a computer is turned into heat. The actual computatiion takes next to nothing in comparison) is definitely not a good idea. Definitely not one thought up by a technical person.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 hours ago

also, you can make computers much more cheap and reliable, more maintainable and much much faster, if you protect them from space radiation by operating them down here, under the protection of earth's atmosphere.