this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
263 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

70215 readers
3500 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
263
We did the math on AI’s energy footprint. Here’s the story you haven’t heard. (www.technologyreview.com)
submitted 1 day ago by kalkulat@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Absolutely needed: to get high efficiency for this beast ... as it gets better, we'll become too dependent.

"all of this growth is for a new technology that’s still finding its footing, and in many applications—education, medical advice, legal analysis—might be the wrong tool for the job,,,"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Loduz_247@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As for OpenAI and Microsoft, they're betting on energy with a company called Helion Energy. They say they'll have it ready by 2028. Whether they'll achieve that? We'll see.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I looked that up and it's a fusion reactor, apparently, from what I can figure out from their nigh-illegible website.

...[reads further] ...

It skips the steam cycle. That's fucking cool. I really hope they get it working.

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They won't.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Care to elaborate?

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 hour ago

there's lots of handwavy things. They even said they "discovered new physics" to explain some disappointing (perfectly predictable, by other established nuclear physicists) results. "Oh the physics equation was wrong, we just need to make everything 25% bigger".

Also, the emitted radiation levels will be insane once it's scaled up