this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
293 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

65819 readers
5234 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (79 children)

First off, I am sex positive, pro porn, pro sex work, and don't believe sex work should be shameful, and that there is nothing wrong about buying intimacy from a willing seller.

That said. The current state of the industry and the conditions for many professionals raises serious ethical issues. Coercion being the biggest issue.

I am torn about AI porn. On one hand it can produce porn without suffering, on the other hand it might be trained on other peoples work and take peoples jobs.

I think another major point to consider going forward is if it is problematic if people can generate all sorts of illegal stuff. If it is AI generated it is a victimless crime, so should it be illegal? I personally feel uncomfortable with the thought of several things being legal, but I can't logically argue for it being illegal without a victim.

[–] froggycar360@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Whats illegal in real porn should be illegal in AI porn, since eventually we won’t know whether it’s AI

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's the same as saying we shouldn't be able to make videos with murder in them because there is no way to tell if they're real or not.

[–] froggycar360@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s a good point, but there’s much less of a market for murder video industry

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, a lot of TV has murders in it. There is a huge market for showing realistic murder.

But I get the feeling your saying that there isn't a huge market for showing real people dying realistically without their permission. But that's more a technicality. The question is, is the content or the production of the content illegal. If it's not a real person, who is the victim of the crime.

[–] froggycar360@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah the latter. Also murder in films for the most part is for storytelling. It’s not murder simulations for serial killers to get off to, you know what I mean?

load more comments (77 replies)