this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
100 points (98.1% liked)

Canada

9587 readers
1842 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Did everyone notice how this election wiped out all the previous leaders and now we're faced with being introduced to a new crowd of political leaders.

Elizabeth May with the Green Party is the only one still standing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 27 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

These are strange times indeed.

This election was so weird in so many ways, I think it will be some time before we fully understand what it all means.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 34 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

I'm just terrified about the younger generation skewing conservative. I get why, but it doesn't make me worry any less. Carney better make housing affordable that all I know.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 19 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, Carney is on an anti-PP ticket. If he doesn't do drastic changes that all demographics see, we're in for whatever hurt the next con leader brings. It's kinda like the UK election and I hope Carney doesn't shit the bed like Starmer. If he understands this and is willing to act, he can.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 13 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I worry even if he does make changes they’ll get ignored or overly politicized like the carbon tax was.

The LPC needs to be 100x better at communication, that is largely what left room for cheap slogans to crush Trudeau.

[–] Warehouse@lemmy.ca 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

He needs to get Canadian news out of Postmedia's hands.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 9 points 19 hours ago

He needs to get Canadian news out of Postmedia’s hands.

And regulate Meta into showing and paying for Canadian news. Also somehow unfucking the algo but I doubt they'd succeed into doing much about that.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I worry even if he does make changes they’ll get ignored or overly politicized like the carbon tax was.

Oof, yeah. I mean one way to help it is to achieve significant enough results that people see and feel in their lives. Universal dental and pharmacare would be two obvious, short-term low hanging fruits. But yeah, they still need to advertise that they did it. Mid-term everyone is waiting on housing costs.

[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 14 points 19 hours ago

Those kids are going to get their faces rubbed in USA fascism for the next four years. Every horror they come up with as their country burns they'll be witness to.

We'll see if they stay conservative or not.

[–] Eczpurt@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

From what I understand, housing has a lot less to do with the federal government and more to do with your municipal and even provincial government. If you are keen on housing improvements, make sure to check with your local mlas and what they have planned for housing. More tangible results will come from there first.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 6 points 15 hours ago

Oh absolutely. But there is plenty the feds can be doing as well. In fact I would argue the financialization of housing is more in the realm of the feds.

[–] piskertariot@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

The definition of conservative needs to change. We're allowed to be fiscally conservative without being hateful bigots. The problem is, the existing parties keep aligning themselves with the wack-jobs, and the alternatives are... the Liberals.

[–] MeowKittyWow@lemmy.ca 14 points 18 hours ago

+1. I am on the left, but I can meet in the middle with a fiscal conservative. Wouldn't like having one in power, but I can live with it.

Social conservatives though? As a trans person, and looking at what's going on south of the border and in the UK, I consider social conservatives to be an existential threat.

I wish we had a legitimately multi-party system that didn't encourage all the conservatives to be under the same umbrella; I would feel a lot safer.

[–] el_muerte@lemm.ee 4 points 18 hours ago

I think the party splitting back into its Progressive Conservative and Reform components is long overdue. PCs might've held their noses and agreed to a merge for the sake of defeating the Liberals, but since then they've sat passively allowing the extreme regressives to take the reins.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

The definition of conservative needs to change. We're allowed to be fiscally conservative without being hateful bigots.

That's called "liberalism." In fact, that's always been called "liberalism." The only reason more people don't understand that fact is that extremist right-wing propaganda is incredibly effective.

[–] potate@lemmy.ca 4 points 18 hours ago

I always appreciated the old adage about Canadian politics that the outcome will always be the most boring option. This was not that.