this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
204 points (97.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

33881 readers
1001 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
vatlark@lemmy.world
forkball@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
SuperEars@lemmy.world
204
At some point, kids watching older cartoons will no longer understand why putting a thermometer under a desk lamp was a way to skip school. (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by rtxn@lemmy.world to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

LED lights are great, but I miss having a mini hot plate on my desk to mindlessly touch and burn my hand.

(Do kids even watch cartoons these days, or do they go into scrolling withdrawal before the first commercial break?)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30p87@feddit.org -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Never had problems with handling them, and analog quality is better for most purposes.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I grew up with analog audio, and still have most of my dad's late 70s "high tech" equipment, about a hundred vinyl records (mostly 33s with a few 45s), and several boxes of audio cassettes. Given the chance... I wouldn't go back. That era had some severe issues that we just had to deal with because it was the best that contemporary technology could offer.

  • Magnetic tapes have a finite shelf life. If not stored in a dry and cool place, the polyurethane tape absorbs moisture, which ruins the binder and the ferromagnetic coating falls off. Eventually the tape itself disintegrates.
  • Magnetic tapes are susceptible to mechanical damage, they naturally stretch, and they can scratch if the rollers are dirty.
  • They are also obviously vulnerable to electromagnetic fields.
  • Playback quality is strongly dependent on the recording equipment, the magnetic medium's quality, and the playback device.
  • Even though the compact cassette is the icon of media sharing, copying is never 1:1 and always incurs a loss in quality.
  • The best achievable audio quality can't physically reach the quality of most digital recordings because of the granularity/resolution of the medium and the noise introduced by the pickup and amplifier circuits. The same is true for vinyl records: the superior audio quality is just a myth.

I loved analog audio recordings when they were relevant, but there are good reasons why magnetic tapes are obsolete, and why we largely skipped the CED and LaserDisc and moved on to CDs and digital audio with their own unique issues.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 6 points 1 day ago

In the theoretical sense, digital sound files have over double the potential dynamic range of the best cassette tape or vinyl. CDs are better, but still well below what can be done with digital files.

The issue is that most digital formats are so compressed that they end up with 1/10th the dynamic range of a cassette tape.

So its more like analog is “better” only because we need to improve storage and up/down speeds before we can truly enjoy how much better digital can be compared to analog. Its just not practical yet