this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
417 points (93.2% liked)

Mildly Interesting

20166 readers
742 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It’d be nice if there were a lever to help remove the brush. I’d rather not physically manipulate the used brush with my hand.

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Woah there! You’re clearly supposed to use your butthole.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

I think that's a you specific issue

[–] Jakule17@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Cleaning or even latex gloves exist for a reason, haha

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Paper towel will also help. You’re gunna be ok.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think I have ever seen a toilet brush with a lever to eject the brush. I also don't think it solves much. You'd have to wash your hands anyway.

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

...say hello to my little friend!..

collapsed inline media

(basically a compact dish scrubbie + bleach detergent embedded into each disposable head: never have to touch the business end to load refills from the caddy nor to eject used scrubbies into the trash)

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago

Wow, that is really terrible!

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 3 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

So imagine you use that, would you lick your fingers right afterwards?

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 3 points 20 hours ago

...straight back to the prep line at chipotle...

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It’s the difference between a large and a small pathogenic load. It seems as though everyone here believes themselves to be perfect hand washers when they likely are not. You can reduce the chance of an occurrence, but rarely can you completely negate it.

No, you’d scrub your hands clean after washing the toilet using a toilet brush and gloves because you expect to perform the act many times across your utterly fallible life. Why introduce additional risk and hassle for no benefit? Frankly, obstinately arguing for extra chores, particularly ones involving poop water, doesn’t make sense to me.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I just think that the head of the brush is a rather arbitrary threshold for when a toilet brush is considered icky or not. The whole thing, including your hands, go into the toilet when you use it. Being able to detach the brush head hand free is a very small but costly improvement. I'd go as far as calling it a false sense of security.

Also, I wash my butthole when I shower. With my hand.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

I think one of us might be doing this wrong, as my hands never go into the toilet.

But you wipe beforehand, right? So there has to be a certain amount of poo you’re willing to accept and a threshold beyond that. I wouldn’t choose to adhere to your poo threshold, is all.

[–] klemptor@startrek.website 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't you clean your toilet brush after you use it?

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

I use sponges that I’ve already sent through the wringer attached to something else. So no

I mean, how else am I gonna get toothpaste

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That's why the gods gave us chewing gum