this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
1251 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

65819 readers
5133 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 28 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I think he would be relieved to get rid of Tesla if someone would buy it. The full self-driving promise was always a matter of interpretation, and the cars they build are more expensive symbols of status than practical products. Tesla can’t compete with global EV manufacturers, that’s a Damocles sword waiting to fall.

SpaceX is where the money is now, and all the electric innovation Tesla did can be used for something else.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 week ago (7 children)

The full self-driving promise was always a matter of interpretation

There's nothing to interpret. It does not fully drive itself.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not safely anyway.

Fortunately for him, and unfortunately for us, he undoubtedly has full control over whichever department defines the word "safely".

Only usable for federal highways, shit could still be banned by the DMVs or equivalents which would basically be a death knell for it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)