this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
1251 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

65819 readers
4924 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 217 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I believe this is the part where we get sued for not buying his cars.

[–] ryan213@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

I'm sure he already calls his lawyers every day at 3 AM while half blitzed on K to pitch exactly that

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think he would be relieved to get rid of Tesla if someone would buy it. The full self-driving promise was always a matter of interpretation, and the cars they build are more expensive symbols of status than practical products. Tesla can’t compete with global EV manufacturers, that’s a Damocles sword waiting to fall.

SpaceX is where the money is now, and all the electric innovation Tesla did can be used for something else.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The full self-driving promise was always a matter of interpretation

There's nothing to interpret. It does not fully drive itself.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 23 points 1 week ago

Musk is neither a Tesla nor an Edison; he is a Barnum.

[–] Flisty@mstdn.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

@OutlierBlue @TeamAssimilation but it will next year, right? Let's just ignore all those times it's veered into the wrong lane or onto train tracks or whatever, it's fine. Next year, next year, next year.

And Mars in a decade.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Starship was supposed to be doing trips to mars each year by last year. Instead it has sometimes managed to not explode on a suborbital trajectory. But of course regulations are what hold it back...

[–] pipe01@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago

SpaceX turns the impossible into late

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

And he wonders why NASA turned him down for bringing those astronauts back...

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not safely anyway.

Fortunately for him, and unfortunately for us, he undoubtedly has full control over whichever department defines the word "safely".

Only usable for federal highways, shit could still be banned by the DMVs or equivalents which would basically be a death knell for it.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Musk is getting $8 million each day from the US government to destroy the US government. He was given $44 billion to destroy Twitter. He's not worried about money.

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Like companies getting sued for not advertising on Twitter

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

That was the joke, yes