this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
32 points (94.4% liked)
/r/50501 Mirror
894 readers
720 users here now
Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
We should, but they won't. That's also not the way the supreme court works. They don't just decide things whenever they want. They have to have a valid court case to create a ruling, which may or may not establish precedent.
Yes, but also a valid court case to challenge this previous ruling is literally any court case where Trump did something that would be illegal for anyone but Trump. Pretty sure the contempt of court, extra-judicial deportation and imprisonment of hundreds of people without due process and insider trading over just the last couple weeks would qualify. Hell two of those things are already in the courts right now.