this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
58 points (98.3% liked)
Progressive Politics
2001 readers
816 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You can get away with allot when you have the right bread and circuses (or religion) going on.
I remember decades ago, when Reagan started defunding cheap/free education. Felt like a "long plan" move back then, and seeing what I see now, I think it was.
To be fair though, the "Champions of The Middle Class^TM^" party is too busy doing fellatio to their rich donor base to win the right votes.
Would help if everybody voted, and not just 63.9%.
~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~
This assumption that everyone who doesnt vote would have voted Democrat if they voted always baffled me.
Actually, I would want/expect everybody to vote for whomever they wanted to, Democratic, Republican, Green, Independent, etc. etc.
My saying what I said is to opine that we need an accurate count/evaluation of what the WHOLE country thinks, and not 60ish% of it. And something tells me that if everybody voted, we wouldn't have a 49/49/2% pattern of the choosing who would lead.
~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~