this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

14393 readers
92 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

This is inaccurate. Graphite is not flammable. It forms small particles that, mixed with air, could combust in a dust explosion, just like flour.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I'm probably just being dense but what's the difference between being flammable and being susceptible to combustion?

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 0 points 2 weeks ago

In technical safety terms, combustibles are harder to ignite than flammables. So diesel and olive oil are combustibles, for example, because neither of them give off enough ignitable vapour at room temperature. Ethanol does, so it gets classified as flammable, and you need to store and handle it more carefully than diesel. Then there's really horrible stuff like triethylborane which will catch fire upon meeting oxygen even at temperatures well below the freezing point of water

Of course in casual usage they mean the same thing

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You're not dense for asking a question. Without asking questions, it's Impossible to learn.

The flash point is different. The flash point is the temperature that is necessary to create enough vapor for the substance to ignite.

Flammable material has a low flash point, which means it catches on fire easily. Think gasoline. Combustibles need a higher initial temperature, but eventually they will burn and sustain the burning until running out. Think wood.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago

Makes perfect sense, thank you

[–] kwomp2@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago

You misgendered round spicy flames

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They’re referring to the relationship between surface area and combustion. Talc, for example, melts but does not burn. Talc powder can ignite if blown over an open flame.

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

My first thought was: "I must try this". I need to read my house insurance policy first.

Curiosity got the better of me when I waved an alcohol wipe over an open flame. There's still a dark mark on the office carpet tile from where I had to stamp it out.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Let it be someone else’s carpet. Or in this case, driveway.

https://youtu.be/Ce_uT1TXYr0

Skip to 3:10 for the action.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

Please invest in a fire blanket and keep it near by when you do stupid things with fire.

Signed, a fellow fire bug

Mine paid for itself the first time a flame got out of control while I was having some fun. No lasting burns to human or objects in my office lol.

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Keep away from dust explosions, they are very uncontrollable because they ignite very fast and produce a lot of heat. It's technically not an explosion, but it definitely is an easy way to burn your house down.

[–] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago

Mythbusters did this with coffee whitener as I recall. Impressive.

This has also happened to sawmills and flour mills, under less controlled circumstances.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Let us just note that this would be impossible when using it to write something.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That.. are you kidding? Can't you read?

OP was wrong, it wasn't pens. Youre wrong, flammability wasn't the problem.

Jesus christ

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago

I don’t know where you got any of this, your comment makes the least sense of anyone in this post, and some of these people are actually wrong

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Wood is also combustible. You need a lot of heat to make wood burn. Hold a lighter to your pencil, it will not instantly catch fire, do the same with paper and you need a water bucket nearby.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sharpen the pencil and create a bunch of tiny shavings then put them in a pure O² environment. They'll light up real fast.

Tbe Apollo 1 fire spread so quickly because in a pure O² environment fucking velcro was super flammable.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, try lighting your pencil on fire in a 100% O2 environment. It's not the pencil being flammable that was dangerous, it was the pure oxygen atmosphere making the pencil extremely flammable to the point where a small spark from static electricity could cause it to almost instantly immolate, that made it dangerous.