this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
401 points (98.5% liked)

World News

45297 readers
155 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/59867996

German media outlets Süddeutsche Zeitung, WDR, and NDR also cite the report, noting that Russian President Vladimir Putin appears intent on testing NATO’s Article 5 guarantees. The alliance’s mutual defence clause obliges member states to come to one another’s aid if attacked. The assessment suggests Putin may seek to challenge how seriously that commitment would be honoured.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nuclear exchange. Yeah it's possible they nukes were maintained about as well as their tanks. It's also possible that we're entirely fucked.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It's not just whether or not the missiles were maintained, they probably weren't, but due to the amount of corruption it's also possible they are lacking critical components that Russia thinks they still have.

Every bad guy in every movie gets his nuclear material from some corrupt Russian military official. Maybe it's true.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah? And if you're wrong we're fucked. To be clear it's not that you or I could do anything about it. We're just either fucked or going to have the world's biggest laugh at the Russians.

[–] aphonefriend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What's the alternative alternative? Roll over and let Russia invade? Then we're all fucked anyway. Might as well take the chance of standing up instead of dying lying down.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah. I'm not disagreeing with that. I'm just mad.