this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
285 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

78024 readers
3433 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dusty_raven@discuss.online 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'm a little confused on how the demosaicing step produced a green-tinted photo. I understand that there are 2x green pixels, but does the naive demosaic process just show the averaged sensor data which would intrinsically have "too much" green, or was there an error with the demosaicing?

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 10 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, given the comment about averaging with the neighbours green will be overrepresented in the average. An additional (smaller) factor is that the colour filters aren't perfect, and green in particular often has some signficant sensitivity to wavelengths that the red and blue colour filters are meant to pick up.

edit: One other factor I forgot, green photosites are often more sensitive than the red and blue photosites.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Plus human eye is more sensitive to green than other channels

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 4 points 4 hours ago

Green is not a creative colour.