this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
543 points (98.7% liked)

World News

51536 readers
2413 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Surely deliberately causing injury with a political goal is terrorism?

[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Look, I know nothing about this incident, I just happened across this thread in my feed. So I say without knowing any context, that no, attacking a single person doesn't sound like the appropriate use of the word terrorism.

Assault, yes. Atempted murder, maybe. But for me terrorism needs to have a broad scope and target innocent people. If any assault was terrorism then all organized crime would be terrorism. Protests that devolve into violence would be terrorism. It weakens the word to use it like this.

Now if that group went down to the local coffee shop and started beating everyone and claiming it's for their cause, terrorism. If they go on social media and call for everyone at home to grab their hammers and kill people indiscriminately in their name, terrorism.

Same with a pressure cooker bomb being called a WMD. It's ridiculous to put a crappy improvised explosive in with nukes and chemical weapons. When you trump up charges is fucks witj everything, like we're seeing here where a peaceful protestor is now being unlawfully detained.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Uk sending weapons to a genocidal state to kill innocent civilians becausw Israel is a political ally is terrorism

Secret Report Undercuts U.K. Condemnations of Pro-Palestinian Group

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What? No. Look it up. Also, PA did not plan to 8njure any police officers

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Looked it up. Turns out it is terrorism. At some point their intent changed. A sledgehammer doesn’t hit someone multiple times without intent.

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

So I don't think the actions of a single individual acting on their own initiative during an action is sufficient to declare the whole group a terrorist organisation. The stated goals of the group do not include "injure or kill anyone who stands in our way, including police officers," though the non-stated goals of that individual might.