this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
362 points (99.5% liked)

News

33795 readers
2470 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 21 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, in a lot of places, the municipal water is perfectly fine to drink. We penalize people who contaminate the groundwater, and the infrastructure is maintained well enough.

We still have water main breaks that result in a boil-water order, because a break in the pipe means bacteria could enter, but I've never had one in any place I've lived in the US.

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

I’m aware of how the system works, just not how common it is. Although I don’t see how boiling would help if some pesticides or industrial chemicals get into the water supply.

To me it looks like you’re all washing floors and filling toilets and watering golf courses with precious drinking water.

[–] Yankee_Self_Loader@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

I can’t specifically speak to watering golf courses as I’m not a golfsman (or whatever they’re called) but as far as washing floors and flushing toilets? In the west yes that is precious drinking water.

As you say you’re familiar with how the system works so you understand that it is far cheaper to have one system of infrastructure to deliver water and have all of that water be drinkable rather than have two sets of pipes where one delivers non-potable water for washing and flushing and one for just drinking water.

Is it wasteful to wash and flush with drinking water? Yeah maybe. Is it also wasteful to maintain two sets of infrastructure just to save drinking water? Also yes

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

To me it looks like you’re all washing floors and filling toilets and watering golf courses with precious drinking water.

As the other person said, yes on the former two, not really on the latter (though there are exceptions).

For an individual, everything is just the one, potable, water supply. Showers, clothes washing, drinking water, lawn watering (though most people don't water their lawns, it's expensive and grass grows just fine by itself). It is more complicated and expensive to deal with a secondary water system for homes to have a non-potable water system, so nobody does. One's water bill is generally the cheapest utility bill.

Fire hydrants hook up to the potable system as well. As that is the only pressurized water that's really available. Though, some places have taps into lakes and such for when the water system runs dry during large-scale fire-fighting. Think massive forest fires.

Farms, golf courses, data centers, nuclear plants, and other industrial uses generally have a secondary water source that isn't potable. These are generally lightly treated well, river, or lake water. This is mostly for cost reasons as full water treatment gets pricey when you are using that much water.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 4 points 12 hours ago

Generally, we just plain don't have water contamination like that. We have enough enforcement of groundwater protection, enough people that care to avoid contamination in the first place, and enough supply from groundwater or snowmelt that even if one source has minor contamination, we can switch to another until it's remediated or within safe levels.

Which is also why we can afford to use potable water for those purposes. There's enough of it to go around; it's not precious here.

Well, except in California and the desert parts of the US, where they're diverting so much of the Colorado river that the further down the river you go, it gets smaller instead of bigger, until sometimes there's no river at all.