this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
170 points (97.8% liked)

science

23213 readers
520 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 63 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I wish more pop science reporters would report on "dark energy" and "dark matter" as the questions they are.

Dark energy is "our best models of physics say redshift is due to movement away, and when we apply that model to our best observations the furthest galaxies appear to be accelerating, what the fuck is making them accelerate"?

(Dark matter is, simpler, "why are all these galaxies rotating as if they have way more matter than we can see -- and why the fuck can't we see that matter?")

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 20 points 21 hours ago

I'd just settle for "missing energy". "dark matter" is fine as it has mass, but doesn't radiate for whatever reason.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

True. Assigning names like these to unknowns has entirely superseded the specific questions in the zeitgeist. They should really be named as something less ambiguous like "unknown accelerant" and "unknown attractor".

[–] ngdev@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago