this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
508 points (98.8% liked)

World News

51475 readers
1809 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More than 20% of the videos that YouTube’s algorithm shows to new users are “AI slop” – low-quality AI-generated content designed to farm views, research has found.

The video-editing company Kapwing surveyed 15,000 of the world’s most popular YouTube channels – the top 100 in every country – and found that 278 of them contain only AI slop.

Together, these AI slop channels have amassed more than 63bn views and 221 million subscribers, generating about $117m (£90m) in revenue each year, according to estimates.

The researchers also made a new YouTube account and found that 104 of the first 500 videos recommended to its feed were AI slop. One-third of the 500 videos were “brainrot”, a category that includes AI slop and other low-quality content made to monetise attention.

The findings are a snapshot of a rapidly expanding industry that is saturating big social media platforms – from X to Meta to YouTube – and defining a new era of content: decontextualised, addictive and international.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] recursive_recursion@piefed.ca 35 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Once Peertube's able to provide the minimal feature parity, I'd bet that most would abandon YouTube similar to what happened with Reddit and Lemmy

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 52 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

I do not think anywhere near most Reddit users came to Lemmy. I wish it were true.

Do we know if Lemmy mods are doing quality content moderation? That and their locking out open source and third-parties is why I mostly avoid Reddit. But I'm not entirely gone.

[–] morto@piefed.social 26 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

and according to fediverse observer, lemmy has been losing a lot of users...

on the other hand, according to statista, reddit has been gaining users and now has more than when the lemmy exodus happened

the truth is that what we did didn't affect them as much as we expected, and most people don't care as well :(

but well, let's keep the flame alive and not lose hope

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, I wouldn't really want everyone on Reddit to come here. With the risk of sounding like some immigrant hating dickbag, they just bring their dumb takes and bot farms with them. What makes Lemmy good right now, is that it's so small and intimate.

[–] morto@piefed.social 4 points 12 hours ago

At least with lemmy we can make our server and defederate with the bigger ones if things get bad like that

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 17 points 13 hours ago

the truth is that what we did didn’t affect them as much as we expected, and most people don’t care as well :(

Most people don't really care about anything. They won't put up with a little inconvenience. Worse than toddlers.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

And they verified those users are not bots?

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 hours ago

That's what I was thinking too. I browse r/all once in a while just to see what's going on, and both the posts and comment sections are AI cesspools

[–] WhatTheDuck@piefed.social 5 points 7 hours ago

I highly doubt Reddit is actually gaining that many new users, but the number of accounts created? Sure.

Reddit never has enough bots for their AI slop machine. They create more bot accounts to "boost engagement" via posts and comments.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago

Anecdotally, my closest friends are all senior level tech workers who are fully aware of what reddit did and the current state of everything, but I'm the only person that's left for Lemmy. They are all still regulars on Reddit. In the same vein, I've written off doing business with many companies due to their shitty practice. Other than my sister also dropping Target, I'm the only person that I know that has stopped giving business to shit companies.

So yea, unfortunately the reality is that the vast vast majority of people just don't care enough change even the smallest of behaviours for ethical reasons. I mentioned something today at my family Christmas that I don't buy Reign energy drinks anymore because I stopped buying PepsiCo after they rolled back DEI. The response was, "get over yourself". That's probably the above average response for most people I know.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 24 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Not at all. Scaling is an issue with P2P video, which is the basis of how Peertube works. Also, FFS, like 0.01% of Reddit is on Lemmy. They talk themselves out of Lemmy in real time in any thread where it comes up.

For real, sometimes it's OK to just serve a smaller community with better truth.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Isn't the whole point of peer to peer to automatically and transparently scale with the number of devices accessing the information?

If every viewer maintains a cache of the most recent videos it's reproduced and shares them back, then the more interest there is in a video the more distributed it will be and the less load there'll be on the original holster.

Seems to work fine for torrents (though needing to stream the chunks in a set order instead of randomly does add some inefficiency).

Of course you need a proper client to do that, can't just use a browser (except maybe with an extension acting as the client), and I've got no idea if that's how peertube works (if it doesn't, the name is disingenuous and false advertising), but it's how it should work, if it ever wants to be able to compete with googles datacentres.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 16 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

i think that's cope unfortunately

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 hours ago

It really is, YouTube to the best of my knowledge stands alone in the service they offer.

Anyone can, at no cost to them, create an account, edit and upload a video up to 12 hours long I believe, and in decent quality. They also have a revenue sharing system where a creator with enough of a viewership base can get a cut, often more than half, of the ad revenue from their videos.

I don't believe anyone else does that, outside of uploading SFW content to Pornhub or something.