this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
133 points (91.8% liked)
Technology
78002 readers
2204 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments


Probably why it isn't standard, especially since there's a driver that does work even if it's suboptimal.
And obviously, there's been no possible way to try loading the modern driver and if that fails, falling back to the legacy one.
This is once again Microsoft refusing to improve performance, because that doesn't directly increase profits.
That's fair. I'm certainly not one to defend msoft, nor do I really have the technical knowledge to rebut. Is it possible that 'trying' the driver as you suggested could damage the drive or corrupt data? Just wondering if there's a legitimate reason they wouldn't go for a seemingly easy win aside from being a generally dumb organization.
There's always the option of gathering device info first, then using the appropriate driver. Either the SSD is in a "known supported models" list, or it reports support for whatever feature the new driver needs.
It's technically possible that straight up trying an unsupported driver can cause physical damage, but this can be avoided by carefully selecting the driver. From MS pov, they'd have to extensively test this driver on a bunch of SSDs and configurations, but it would lead to a performance improvement.
Ah, any developer who suggested that probably got the same answer I get at work: "Testing costs money, so unless we absolutely have to, no."
Is this not the test? Make it available, but you have to jump through hoops to enable?
If only there was a way to do a check for compatibility on the os side for a standard that has been available since before the predecessor os was released and fall back to the older driver if it fails
So they can't just write some probe code? It really can't be that hard to determine if there's support.