this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2025
391 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

77923 readers
3220 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Several of Waymo's autonomous vehicles were seen stuck in the middle of San Francisco streets following a significant power outage that took out the city's traffic lights. Waymo responded to the power outage by suspending its ride-hailing services in the city, but images and videos on social media showed the self-driving taxis stopped at intersections with hazard lights on.

"We have temporarily suspended our ride-hailing services in the San Francisco Bay Area due to the widespread power outage," Suzanne Philion, a spokesperson for Waymo, told Engadget in an email. "Our teams are working diligently and in close coordination with city officials, and we are hopeful to bring our services back online soon."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (9 children)

Easy. Give police the ability to remotely control driverless cars.

I mean, that is going to be a thing they will implement anyway, and probably not restricted to driverless cars.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 29 points 3 days ago (7 children)

If you give police a backdoor to control self-driving cars, somebody is going (to hack it and) use it to kill somebody.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca -2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

You can already kill someone with a car without any hacking.

  1. Get a car
  2. Drive over someone
  3. "Oops accident"

It happens every day.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The commenter before me described the solution, give cops an override, as easy. I wanted to highlight that it isn't that easy. Unintended side effects ought to be considered before coming up with seemingly easy solutions. And this problem is not dissimilar to the one about encrypted chats and law enforcement wanting a backdoor into that. If you build a backdoor, it's not guaranteed that only the good guys use it. And that raises questions about privacy on the encryption front or questions about abuse, safety, and liability on the self-driving car front.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca -4 points 3 days ago

I'm not arguing any of that. Giving police access to a car override would open up horrible abuse of power but that wasn't your argument. Your argument was that people would hack it to kill people.

I'm saying that it's much easier to kill someone by just driving over them with your car and claiming it's an accident. It happens every day and people walk away without any repercussions. No hacking necessary.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)