this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2025
566 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

77843 readers
3523 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

After the controversial news shared earlier this week by Mozilla’s new CEO that Firefox will evolve into “a modern AI browser,” the company now revealed it is working on an AI kill switch for the open-source web browser.

On Tuesday, Anthony Enzor-DeMeo was named the new CEO of Mozilla Corporation, the company behind the beloved Firefox web browser used by almost all GNU/Linux distributions as the default browser.

In his message as new CEO, Anthony Enzor-DeMeo stated that Firefox will grow from a browser into a broader ecosystem of trusted software while remaining the company’s anchor, and that Firefox will evolve into a modern AI browser and support a portfolio of new and trusted software additions.

What was not made clear is that Firefox will also ship with an AI kill switch that will let users completely disable all the AI features that are included in Firefox. Mozilla shared this important update earlier today to make it clear to everyone that Firefox will still be a trusted web browser.

collapsed inline media

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The issue is that there aren't many of us Firefox users left, so asking us while FF wants to get NEW users to expand the market share (which is badly needed, so they do not lose their seat at the table regarding web standards, and to make them less dependent on googles payments) is not helpful at all.

As long as i can switch it off with one click, i couldn't care less and will continue using FF, but as you can see many existing users will bitch and moan even if it's just one click.

[–] Dekkia@this.doesnotcut.it 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

so asking us while FF wants to get NEW users

This is a balancing act and Mozilla behaves like an elefant in a porcelain shop right now. Worst case they loose their current users without attracting new ones.

existing users will bitch and moan even if it's just one click

I'm one of them. Why not make it one click for people who want it instead?

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Worst case they loose their current users without attracting new ones.

And where to?

Ladybird, Servo and Floorp are all not useable as a daily driver and will take years to get there (and btw, the ladybird guy is a major shithead and last i heard of Servo was that they were going to cater to the embedded market, not a full blown browser).

Firefox forks can do what they want, even switch off the AI button, but i'd still say they help keeping the browser engine itself afloat, because they still depend on Firefox - there's not one fork with enough dev staff to keep up. That leaves us with chromium based browsers and safari. I'd say the commitment to the current userbase to make the changes optional is good enough to keep most of them.

I ’m one of them. Why not make it one click for people who want it instead?

I'd put current Firefox users much more in the department of "able to find the settings" than the vast majority of users. The majority wants something that works with everything they throw at it out of the box without rummaging through settings.

[–] Dekkia@this.doesnotcut.it 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

And where to?

If both noteworthy browser engines are made by companies who make decisions against their user's interest I might as well switch to the one with higher development budget.

The majority wants something that works with everything they throw at it out of the box without rummaging through settings.

And where does AI come into play here? It's not like a browser without AI doesn't work.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

At least Firefox isn't an extension of the worlds largest ad company, no amount of dev budget can fix that.

Context aware search, summarizing in side view or importing an agent directly from a repository into your browser are things that come to mind without much thinking, and i am not a developer.

[–] Dekkia@this.doesnotcut.it 1 points 47 minutes ago

Context aware search, summarizing in side view or importing an agent directly from a repository into your browser are things that come to mind without much thinking, and i am not a developer.

And this is something normal users require?

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub -1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Chill out. It's literally just a sidebar for your LLM of choice.

Don't like it? Don't use it.

Don't want it to clutter up your context menu? The same menu contains the option to disable it. Boom! Problem solved.

Gonna use Chromium-based with no µBlock because your feelings got hurt? Have fun.