this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
400 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

77870 readers
4395 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 69 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'll strongly suggest to take out all the cheaply AI generated music from this "back up" and save themselves some space.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not sure how they would go about doing that at scale without also getting some false positives and removing human music too

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You could cut off your search around the time AI tracks started to appear. Not sure when that was, maybe 2023. You'd miss a lot of recent stuff, but you'd filter out a lot of spam too

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 4 points 14 hours ago

I see your point, but as you say, there would still be the tradeoff of missing more recent stuff. That might only involve missing a couple of years' worth of stuff now, but AI isn't going away any time soon, so it would mean that there'd be an increasing amount of human made music not being archived; One of the things I like about Anna's archive is that they seem to look at this problem as a long term, informational infrastructure kind of way, so I imagine they wouldn't be keen on stopping the archive at 2023.

It seems they've opted for a different tradeoff instead: lower popularity songs are archived at a lower bitrate, and even the higher popularity stuff has some compression. Some archives go for quality, and thus prioritise high quality FLACs, so Anna's archive are aiming to fulfill a different niche. I can respect that.

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

do you have any numbers on the AI share? I doubt it's more than a 2%, so I assume you are just virtue signalling on a completely unrelated topic here :-)

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AI slop can be made and distributed in ginourmous numbers. I wouldn't be suprised if at least 3/4 of uploads from the past 2 years are AI.

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

See, 75% of output of 2 years vs 100 years of music production. Also popularity was factored in.

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A bot could put 100 AI generated tracks on Spotify per hour. 50 bots doing the same is 120,000 tracks per day.

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

can you run me the numbers for 200 bots?

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

120,000 x 4 = 480,000

This is easy to do with a calculator.

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 hours ago