this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
349 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

77815 readers
2882 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Direct quote from the page:

Please note that this site is only about US law; the copyright terms in other countries are different.[2]

On January 1, 2026, thousands of copyrighted works from 1930 enter the US public domain, along with sound recordings from 1925. They will be free for all to copy, share, and build upon

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Software in general is actually very hard to copyright, as you cannot legally copyright code, the most you're allowed to do is patent the process the code is doing.

More often the copyright applies to everything else, like the brand, and the UI

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

No, copyright applies specifically to the code, eulas and copyleft such as GPL rely on that fact. The logic itself can't be, but the specific implementation can. It's why clean room reverse engineering is fine, but a tainted decompilation direct from a binary may not be.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 hours ago

Ooh yeah I always forget that