this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
256 points (97.1% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

5880 readers
210 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The guy is getting roasted in the comments too, especially about being unfair to NDs

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Counterpoint. If you give someone your phone number, you shouldn't be shocked if they try to call it.

[–] taco@anarchist.nexus 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Nobody mentioned being shocked; your "counterpoint" is countering a point nobody made. You don't have to be shocked to be busy or avoid answering unknown numbers, ( which is the norm now )

It's expected that a caller with a legitimate professional purpose would leave a message. Has been since the answering machine came around. This isn't some sort of novel wholistic approach to someone's personally, it's a specific, arbitrary filter to find people who don't follow normal telephone interaction behaviors.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Counter-Counterpoint. If you call someone, you should understand that they may be unable to answer to phone at a that specific time, and you should use the tools at your disposal, such as voicemail, to facilitate further communication.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 10 minutes ago)

Oh yes. The boomer is at fault also (but will try calling again). His attitude wasn't my argument.