this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
231 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

77791 readers
2965 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] T4V0@lemmy.pt 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks. Oh yes, I heard about this technology (but not the latest update) from a youtube video. It’s completely insane!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UdNB3ZY4Ks

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Insanely good or Insanely stupid?

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It has its pros and cons. Pros are that it's faster and uses less energy and no complex optics system. Cons are that they have to replace the masks fairly regularly because they degrade with each imprint made. This probably also means that yields are lower towards the end of the life of the mask.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

Huge QC fail rates. Will not scale well.

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Can someone smarter than me or at least more informed explain how this compares

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

Ok in a lab, but saying they will scale by 2027 is pure fiction.