this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
629 points (96.3% liked)
memes
18491 readers
2889 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Some programming languages do away with operator precedence for a big parsing speed boost. J/APL and stack languages are "best known". in J, right to left parsing,
16 = 4 * 2 + 2
Assuming an equation with no context is anything but standard mathematics is peak "well, technically"
There's big advantages to no precedence rules. You don't have to remember them all. Haskell/SML family create nightmares from trying to have user defined operators with precedence "value" of 0-10. Operators are extremely powerful syntax simplification, but precedence rules makes them too hard to mentally parse.