politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I wonder how many people wonder what their local laws are on the use of deadly force in defense of another. After all, someone not in uniform and not identifying themselves seems like they're just a kidnapper.
Here in Oregon it's pretty clear, YMMV:
https://oregon.public.law/statutes/ors_161.219
"a person is not justified in using deadly physical force upon another person unless the person reasonably believes that the other person is:
(1) Committing or attempting to commit a felony involving the use or threatened imminent use of physical force against a person; or
(2) Committing or attempting to commit a burglary in a dwelling; or
(3) Using or about to use unlawful deadly physical force against a person. [1971 c.743 §23]"
In the case of an attempted kidnapping and the officers fail to identify themselves as such, that would fall under (1):
"Kidnapping in the first degree is a Class A felony."
https://oregon.public.law/statutes/ors_163.235
"Kidnapping in the second degree is a Class B felony."
https://oregon.public.law/statutes/ors_163.225
Thank you for the detail.
Some additional context from Snopes as to why this is so important in Oregon especially:
Personal reports from a friend of mine on the front lines in Portland corroborate this tactic - the group she was with was followed home by one of the vans described above.
Her mugshot (she had been in the system before) then appeared in a line-up banner of "Antifa Criminals" that started circulating around right-wing websites. As she's trans, she ended up having to move and go underground because of the death threats.
If you're in any way part of a population that Trump is targeting, be ready to defend yourself. Remember that once you're in the system, not only will the cops have your data, but it will be leaked to the alt-right thugs willing to do the dirty work the cops won't.
Oh, it's actually WORSE than that. Not only were undercover feds disappearing people from the streets of Portland, the acting guy in charge, "Chad Wolf" (not EVEN making that up) was never confirmed.
The whole operation was illegal, top to bottom.
https://www.npr.org/2020/07/17/892277592/federal-officers-use-unmarked-vehicles-to-grab-protesters-in-portland
https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/senate-should-ask-chad-wolf-about-his-illegal-appointment
Probably depends on if the state has a Good Samaritan law and how it is worded. A quick search found me an article written by a criminal defense attorney in Phoenix, AZ and AZ's law makes "injecting" yourself into a dangerous situation illegal.
Article
Same in Mass where the journalist was, she was also unable to acquire a firearm because of her residence status.
They seemed to present badges when they approached her. Can someone correct me on this?
Looking at the image on the article, it looks like tubby brownshirt has a badge hanging around his neck.
Not that that actually means anything:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07K71JM14
Surely never gets into the hands of bad actors... oh, wait...
https://katu.com/news/local/portland-police-arrest-felon-slumped-over-in-stolen-car-say-they-had-fake-police-badge-and-loaded-gun?photo=1
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/man-with-fake-badge-and-ammunition-arrested-outside-capitol/
https://abcnews.go.com/US/man-fake-fbi-badge-bb-gun-arrested-after/story?id=104936435
The only people capable of doing anything about armed masked people illegally detaining random innocent people are other armed people, since most democrats and Lefties don't own guns, you must rely on fascist white supremacists police officers or armed redneck Republicans.
You might be surprised about that...
https://www.ncja.org/crimeandjusticenews/u-s-liberals-emerge-as-surprisingly-growing-group-of-gun-owners
I'd also argue that if you're a member of a minority group, it's past time you consider arming yourselves.
Women:
https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/5057508-women-gun-ownership-america/
LGBTQ+:
https://newsisout.com/2025/03/the-rise-of-lgbtq-gun-ownership-safety-politics-and-identity/30477/
Black:
https://www.npr.org/sections/pictureshow/2022/10/13/1126878376/christian-lee-captures-black-gun-ownership-in-armed-doesnt-mean-dangerous
Hispanic:
https://english.elpais.com/usa/2024-06-24/gun-purchases-soar-among-latinos-in-the-united-states.html
Also, it's past time immigrants armed themselves, to protect themselves and their families.
Thanks for the great info, but "growing group" does not mean it's equivalent to the unbelievably overwhelming quantity of firearms Christian fascist Republicans own.
It's not surprising at all that vulnerable groups of people are buying guns, but go to any local range to see who's training and see that very few non-republican minorities or women regularly train with them.
If you buy a firearm and never train marksmanship you might as well hand over these fascists your guns.
This is true and locally, the issue I face, is that way more ranges than I'm comfortable with require NRA membership and that's simply a non-starter.
There are options, the one I used most often is run by the county sheriff:
https://www.clackamas.us/pstc
It's a decent range, but directly run by the cops and there are issues with the cops here having worked directly with the fascists:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/disturbing-texts-between-oregon-police-far-right-group-prompts-investigation-n972161
I did my AR training here, decent folks, but it's kind of a hike now from where I'm at:
https://www.threatdynamics.com/
There's one across the river in Washington State, the problem there being Oregon and Washington don't have reciprocity on concealed carry, would be entirely too easy to accidentally get in trouble.
https://www.englishpit.com/
There's a new one that's been TRYING to open for 3 years now, LGBTQ+ friendly which is good, but I guess they're having permit and construction issues. :( Gun shop is open, just not the range. They don't even really have a website, just an Instagram. Feels rinky dink, but I'm hopeful!
Get together with other like minded people, and create an LLC or co-op or whatever, pool you're money, buy a chunk of land and make your own range.
I mean, I've been watching the new one for 3 years now, they have a building, and it's mostly open, but they still can't get the range functional.
I don't know if it's bad management, poor funding, or a lack of permitting or whatnot, but if they can't pull it off with an actual operational business, it doesn't give me much hope. :(
We'll they're trying to run a business and make a profit. You make a club and it's a one time buyin for being able to co-own a piece of land. No one is profiting and so you don't need to deal with all the red tape that comes with that.
If you have any federal land grants near you (often found in rural areas outside suburbs) you can shoot for free, into a berm.