this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
346 points (86.3% liked)

memes

18466 readers
2660 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pfr@piefed.social 26 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Proton has become a problem for privacy

[–] ExtremeUnicorn@feddit.org 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 11 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

The biggest threat is that the CEO is pro maga (cue defenders saying "well ackshully") and thinks trump is better for his business (cue tankie both sidesers).

The other threat is that at some point proton gave an IP address or something obtained through a legal france->swiss court order allowing french ACABs to hunt and skin the most dangerous game: journalists

Edit, activist I guess https://www.itpro.com/security/privacy/360793/protonmail-criticised-sharing-activists-ip-address-law-enforcement

[–] percent@infosec.pub 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

🤔 why is the privacy thing not the biggest threat? I would think that the privacy one would be more of a threat to privacy than the political stuff. Is that not the case?

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know how you can, with a straight face, separate "political" and "privacy" stuff. They are intrinsically linked.

The amount of hoops needed to make the IP address thing, which is just IP address, happen...massive

[–] percent@infosec.pub 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Sure, I can imagine the political issues could lead to privacy issues. My question was not about whether or not that's true[^1]. I was simply wondering why a possible privacy issue would rank higher than the actual issue that has already happened.

[^1]: Something more specific/objective might be helpful though. Saying he's "pro maga" is like saying he's "bad vibes"; it requires the reader to just take your word for it without knowing exactly why. But, again, my question was more about the ranking

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

I just don't think the IP address is a big deal. A category 5 probably outranks a definite tropical depression.

[–] ExtremeUnicorn@feddit.org 1 points 41 minutes ago

Okay, so about #1: Is there more to it than him setting of one single post praising Trump's business skills? I mean, that's pretty stupid, but stamping him as "Pro-MAGA" for that seems a bit far fetched still.

About #2: That's also concerning and pretty bad as it reads, but any company basically has to abide the country's laws, so if Interpol orders the Swiss police to fetch the data, no legally operating company can really do anything about it or they're gone as well. A similar thing happened to Tutanota in Germany, iirc.