this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
535 points (98.4% liked)

News

33652 readers
2280 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The commander of the arm of the U.S. military responsible for Donald Trump's illegal military occupations of American cities said he is willing to conduct attacks on so-called designated terrorist organizations within the U.S.

This startling admission comes after months of extrajudicial killings of alleged members or affiliates of DTOs in the waters near Venezuela, which experts and lawmakers say are outright murders.

Gen. Gregory Guillot’s sopenness about the potential for unprecedented military action within U.S. borders comes as the White House, Pentagon, and Justice Department continue to refuse to rule out summary executions of Americans on Trump's secret enemies list, after weeks of requests for clarifications from The Intercept.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thorry@feddit.org 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Good luck using those guns when you get painted by a Predator drone from 8 miles away and have a missile shoved down your throat at Mach 2. That won't happen? Tell that to all those people on the boats the US blew up. Oh wait you can't, they all got murdered.

The idea of fat idiots with guns somehow being the heroes who defend democracy against the big bad government is a joke. Not only is the power difference fucking huge, most of those gun freaks are fascist and bootlickers themselves. They voted for that big bad government. Americans are among the most brainwashed in the world and they don't even know it.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Missiles are expensive and always in short supply when you try to use a lot. Only the land forces have enough firepower to deal with the whole country.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Missiles are expensive and always in short supply when you try to use a lot.

I guarantee they've got more missiles than you've got extra lives.

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think you'd be surprised how fast entire groups of people surrender once you vaporize a couple of compounds where those militia hold up. You don't need to kill each and every one of them, you just need to show how futile their fight is and they'll give up quickly. This won't be like some last stand situation where two parties stand off against each other. It's a group of people concentrated in a small area against people who have weapons designed to kill a group of people concentrated in a small area. Sure, some small groups might turn to guerrilla tactics and blow shit up. But I think the people in charge are mostly fine with that. They don't give two shits about the general public and have plenty of private and actual armies to protect themselves. It won't change a thing and they'll hunt down the worst offenders pretty quickly.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's a group of people concentrated in a small area

Uhhhh.... What? What groups in what area? The US is massive, has a low population density and popular opinion is incredibly geographically fragmented. There aren't really organized militant communes and certainly none that would be hostile to the admin...

I seriously doubt that even in the high density, mostly blue areas people would kowtow to drones glassing city blocks just to kill one or two insurgents that might statistically live there. When the penalty for merely existing near a suspect is death or getting your house leveled there's not an option to lay down. You either move out (and take your anger with you) or buckle down and start hiding your neighborhood insurgents so (hopefully) the bombs don't get dropped at all.

They don't give two shits about the general public

About their safety? No. But they still need to maintain some order so the social machine functions. The USA just doesn't have the political mechanisms or generational fealty to allow military policing of domestic life. And as we've learned 1000x over from history, a hostile occupying force doesn't work as a long term strategy.

If a population decides they're not gonna put up with it then that's the end of it, one way or another. Grooming a populace to accept military policing would mean drastically overhauling social + political structures and unwinding 400 years of law enforcement precedent. There isn't any project 20XX that could possibly do that, these idiots just lack the patience and foresight to realize that.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

"They" is a fairly representative cross section of people aged 18-25 and the actual low level trigger pullers will refuse to fire on apartment buildings in the US.