this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
190 points (97.5% liked)

Games

44005 readers
1419 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

At first, Larian had planned to continue working with Hasbro’s Wizards of the Coast division on Dungeons & Dragons, but Vincke said he and his team spent a few months working on a new project before realizing they weren’t feeling the excitement they once did. “Conceptually, all of the ingredients for a really cool game were there except the hearts of the developers,” he said. They abandoned that game last year and pivoted to Divinity, a franchise that Larian also happens to own.

It’s crazy they have the finances to be working on a D&D franchise game and decide “…Nah. Let’s do something else.”

They recently switched to a new engine…

Uh oh.

I know folks like to hate on Unity, and Borderlands 3. Rightfully so. But let me list out some “in house engine” releases:

  • Cyberpunk 2077, which Nvidia backing

  • Mass Effect Andromeda, after previously being Unreal

  • Starfield

  • Paradox Grand Strategy, like Stellaris

  • A “smaller studio” example, Distant Worlds 2

All these drug their developers through hell, and we’re still technical messes at release. And after.

Now let’s look at some others:

  • KCD2: CryEngine

  • Expedition 33: Unreal

  • Black Myth Wukong: Unreal

  • Stray: Unreal

  • As a “smaller studio” example, Satisfactory: Unreal

…I’m just saying. Making a modern engine from scratch is hard. There are just too many things to worry about. And the record of “RPG studios rolling a new in house engine” is not great.

So what I hope this means is Larian moving to CryEngine or something like that, and not making something from scratch. But if they’re talking about early access so soon, I bet they licensed another engine.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Re D&D,

It's because Hasbro gutted the D&D division and burned their goodwill with Larian. https://www.pcgamer.com/theres-almost-nobody-left-ceo-of-baldurs-gate-3-dev-swen-vincke-says-the-dandd-team-he-initially-worked-with-is-gone-due-to-hasbro-layoffs/

Hasbro could have done nothing and made a bunch of money, but they chose temporary short term gains. Baldur's Gate 4 will arrive far sooner than you think, and it will be terrible.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

WTF. That's awful, and also totally baffling. "This single game is responsible for a huge chunk of revenue and introducting countless people to D&D; let's lay off its staff and leadership."

Baldur’s Gate 4 will arrive far sooner than you think, and it will be terrible.

What do you mean by this? An outsourced spinoff is already in the works? I don't see that in the linked article.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nothing has been announced as far as Baldur's Gate 4 goes yet. It looks like Hasbro is being a little bit smart and are going to try and make ("make") a handful of other smaller games, like the recent Warlock game announcement.

But at some point Baldur's Gate 4 will be announced, but Hasbro isn't going to be willing to invest properly into it in order to make a good game.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

like the recent Warlock game announcement.

That's a very... abstract trailer.

Yeah, I'm suspicious too.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They said very little about what that new engine entails, but much like Starfield, I suspect it's largely reusing their old engine and only remaking select parts of it. Larian is doing something in the RPG space that, to me, makes nearly all of their competitors feel outdated, and it makes sense to me to make their own engine to do that as efficiently as possible. To make one of their games in an off the shelf engine like Unreal, with all of the bespoke physics objects and the ways every entity interacts with spells, elements, and other effects, could easily result in huge performance costs above and beyond what we saw in Act 3 of BG3.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Depends how much they “redo”.

I’m utterly terrified of them pulling an Andromeda/2077 and getting stuck in dev hell trying to debug the new engine bits instead of actually building the game. This is the advantage of prebuilt engines: someone else has already one all the hardware support/optimization and contemporary architecture stuff for you.

I’m less afraid of them pulling a Starfield, I suppose. The “divinity engine” in BG3 already runs okay. It’s not sleek like CryEngine KCD2, but it doesn’t feel janky or dated either, and even the mildest refresh over BG3 would be fine.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Much less is determined by engine than the average person thinks. Andromeda wasn't a new engine; it was an engine that was made to make Battlefield games that then had to be used to make action RPGs and racing games after the fact. Capcom made an engine for the games they had in mind 10 years ago, and it's fantastic at Resident Evil, Devil May Cry, and even serving as an emulation wrapper, but it's showing cracks under the support for open world games that they added more recently. Larian's engine is made to support the systems driven RPGs they conceptualized in the early 2010s, and there's little chance some other engine will do it just as well or better without plenty of custom code anyway. Ask Digital Foundry about all of the "optimization" Unreal 5 has done for developers already.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This is a fair point. When I made the original comment, I didn’t realize their in house engine went so far back:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divinity_Engine

If they can shoehorn in something akin to KCD2’s or Satisfactory’s Global Illumination, but keep their dev workflows and existing systems in place, that’d be perfect.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

From the other Larian article in this community, it seems their engine improvements are largely things that they claim will allow them to iterate on ideas faster, like going right from mocap to a usable animation more quickly.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That sounds excellent.

I truly love that Larian leadership frames everything they talk about around devs and their needs/wants. Another D&D game? “Oh, that’s great and all, but our devs hearts weren’t in it so we dropped it like a rock.” New engine? They ramble about improvements to dev workflows. It is so obviously a top priority.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Keep in mind that also comes with Vincke championing AI, and though he says no genAI assets will make it to the final product, there's still some dissent. Here's hoping though.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Well that can be reasonable. Obviously don’t vibe code an engine, but LLMs are great for basic code autocomplete, or quick utility scripts, things like that.

Really specialized AI (not LLMs/GenAI) can be great at, say, turning raw mocap into character animations. Or turning artist sketches into 3D models. Cogs in their pipeline, so to speak, which has nothing to do with GenAI slop making it into a final product.

The line is very fine though, and most in the business world skew to the side of pushing slop.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think very little about AI compared to most people, for or against, but it largely seems to me like a solution in search of a problem, and it's very cult-like how many CEOs get on board with it so quickly despite its very public lack of actually good results. On paper, the way Vincke describes their use of it sounds fine to me, but hopefully he's not doing something so idiotic as to mandate its usage, as is happening at workplaces for friends of mine right now.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well again, it depends.

“Mandate its usage” could mean the motion cap/animation people have to learn some kind of automation tool, that’s now part of the engine.

That’s fine.

And that’s very different from the “you MUST make X hits to Microsoft Copilot” type garbage that’s so common now.


I’m harping on this because I’m afraid Larian will try something reasonable, yet get immense, unwarranted backlash (both internally and publically) because of other workers’ experiences with enshittified ML. And how politicized “AI” is becoming.

Machine learning is not bad. Tech Bro evangelism and the virus they spread among executives, is. And I don’t want the garbage they sell to poison tools studios like Larian could use to get ahead of AAA publishers.

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

…I’m just saying. Making a modern engine from scratch is hard. There are just too many things to worry about. And the record of “RPG studios rolling a new in house engine” is not great.

Larian's track record is good. They used an in-house engine for Divinity: Original Sin, Divinity: Original Sin 2, and Baldur's Gate 3. They also made their own game engine for their older Divinity titles (Divine Divinity and Beyond Divinity). And Vincke attributes at least part of their success to using in-house tools instead of "off the shelf" engines.