I was just reflecting on games I've played in the last year, and wondering when Steam's year-in-review thing would be happening (probably within the next week).
However, I thought it might be interesting to ask this question before that drops, because I'd expect that people will respond differently before they've seen the data, and I think that subjective aspect of the reflection is interesting. So tell me what games you've played in the past year that have most stuck out to you. I think it's more fun if you try to go by memory, but if you want to go check stuff like whether you first played a game in December 2024 or January 2025, that's fine too; just try to not get too deep into the data, I'm interested in the vibes here.
For me, a recent highlight was Clair Obscur: Expedition 33. I didn't expect to be able to play it for a long while because of its cost, but a friend got it for me in November, for my birthday. I like that I'll always associate it with them for that reason. The game is also very me, what with its artsy fartsy themes and the like.
Before that, I played a heckton of Hades 2, which I thoroughly enjoyed, even if it didn't quite scratch the same itch that the first game did. I've not 100%ed it yet, but I plan to. My favourite part of the game is the music — the boss fight that incorporates music in a cool way is so awesome
And before that was Hollow Knight, partly motivated by hearing all the hype in the runup to Silksong's release. I'd been weirdly resistant to playing Hollow Knight for years. I think it's because when something is so universally lauded, it makes me feel oddly anxious. Like, if I don't enjoy it, does that mean I have bad taste? What if it is objectively amazing, but it just doesn't click with me, and I feel sad that I'm missing out on whatever magic everyone else is experiencing? Or what if everyone else is wrong, and the game is way overhyped? They're silly thoughts, but this is fairly common for me (this is why I resisted watching Breaking Bad for years). Fortunately I loved it, and I expect that Silksong will be one of my highlights of 2026. Beautiful soundtrack that I've listened to so much that it was in my Spotify wrapped.
The most interesting part of my year is that I branched out more and played smaller games, outside of the typical stuff I'd play, and for a delightfully silly reason: this Venn diagram(Source).
I stumbled across that when I was voraciously consuming as much Disco Elysium analysis as I could back in 2024, when I played it. I had already played Pathologic 2 (largely due to hbomberguy's video essay on the first one), as well as Planescape:Torment (because so many had cited that as a clear influence on Disco Elysium). This gave me enough points of reference on that venn diagram that I became determined to play all the games included (i.e. Disco Elysium, Pentiment, Felvidek, The Life and Suffering of Sir Brante, Planescape: Torment, Pathologic 2. The middle section is not a game, but a book (which I haven't read): Umberto Eco's The Name of the Rose)
I was utterly enchanted by this Venn diagram to an absurd degree. According to it:
- Pentiment = Disco Elysium - Pathologic 2;
- Felvidek = Disco Elysium - Planescape: Torment; and
- The Life and Suffering of Sir Brante = Felvidek + Pentiment Based off the first two statements, I felt like I could approximate the vibe of Pentiment and Felvidek, but I was intrigued to test that, and I played two games I don't think I would have otherwise.
Pentiment was delightful. I played a bunch of it when a medievalist friend was visiting me, and they verified that every weird and wonderful animal drawings were actually drawn from real medieval manuscripts. They worked with multiple historians to ensure the history depicted was accurate, and it made for an incredibly immersive experience. I loved how the text in the speech bubbles were written in a different script depending on how the protagonist perceived them — more educated people speak with a fancied script than peasants, for example. It really grounds the game in the protagonist's subjective perspective, which synergised so well with the historical setting. I learned so much from this game and from analysis content of it. Apparently Josh Sawyer studied history as an undergraduate, and he'd been wanting to make a game like this for years; I'm so glad he got the chance to make it.
Felvidek is a much smaller game than Pentiment — small enough that I would have felt grumpy at its price if not for the fact that it was clearly a labour of love by a small team. It's a JROG based in a psuedo-historical version of Slovakia, which I found cool, because I knew next to nothing about Slovakian culture. I still don't, because it's not really that kind of game, but I felt like I came away understanding more. It's the kind of game where I felt close to the developer, given that it was such a small project. If you were going to try any of the games I mentioned here, I'd recommend this one, because I'd wager you've not heard of it. If it looks like the kind of game you'd play, I'd advise you go in blind to maximise the impact of the generally absurd vibes. The soundtrack was a highlight for me — it really drove home the absurdity.
Having completed these two pillars of the Venn diagram, I was finally able to complete my quest with The Life and Suffering of Sir Brante. However, I find myself running out of steam and unable to write much more, but it was a fun little experience. Not quite as out there as Felvidek, but definitely something I wouldn't have played ordinarily.
Experimenting with new games also encouraged me to push myself out of my comfort zone further, with games like Fear & Hunger, and Signalis. I'm not great with horror, but that's part of why this was fun.
Anyway, what games have been highlights for you guys? Don't feel pressured to write anywhere near as much as I have — I mostly just wrote this much because I appear to be procrastinating making dinner.

There are too many games I want to play and not enough time to play them, and with a programming background, I decided to basically use Agile methodology to schedule which games I can reasonably finish in a given month. I've been tracking my completion times and comparing against How Long To Beat to get good ballpark estimates. This year, I've beaten 30 games, 15 of which came out in 2025, and I think I can beat 3 more before the year is done. When a new game comes out, I don't like to play it unless I've played the earlier / mainline / canon entries in the series, so not only did I play Borderlands 4, I played through 1-3, the Tales games, and the Pre-Sequel. I played through the first three Mafia games and intend to play The Old Country once the Steam sale starts. I played not only Kingdom Come: Deliverance II but also its predecessor.
Speaking of KC:D2, that's the best game I played this year, by quite a margin. Obsidian put out two great games this year in Avowed and The Outer Worlds 2, but despite obviously sharing a lot of the same bones, they deliver quite different experiences. Dispatch was a treat. Split Fiction was what I wanted as an iteration on It Takes Two. Borderlands 4 continues what Borderlands 3 set up in making its systems fun for math nerds. Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 was fun and novel in so many ways, and I love the story behind its development; I do wish that I loved the execution of its story more, and I wish the combat wasn't so feast or famine, but those things didn't seem to bother most people. The Alters might be the most slept on game in 2025 relative to its quality; seriously, it's a great story, and it's nice to see that level of presentation in a game of its scope and genre. (A lot of Unreal 5 games in that list...)
I'm curious what your take on Borderlands was after paying them all back to back. I've been a fan of that world since the beginning, and I'm curious how they stand up without the nostalgia. And of course, which was your favorite?
This series is pretty crazy to play through back to back, because they have to escalate so many times.
Borderlands 1 has the flattest progression curve of the series, and I say that in a good way. I very much prefer flatter progression curves in RPGs, or loot games in this case. It solves a lot of problems with scaling difficulty, eliminating grind, and so on. That said, this is the only game in the series that checks this box. This one sticks fairly close to its North star of Halo meets Mad Max; the premise is simple and it works. I played Roland, because the turret seemed to be helpful when playing solo.
Borderlands 2 is where it finds its identity that it's known for; actually, they sort of found that identity in the DLC for the first game, but here the characters get much talkier. It comes with a major upgrade in game feel and pacing.
The Pre-Sequel is the blandest of the series by far. The characters are boring, and the elements they use to spice up the formula are not very spicy. The boss fights are well designed though, even in a way that gives it something it does better than 2. But something else interesting happens in this game. I played the class where you get a little drone that comes along and marks targets. Later up the skill tree, this gives you access to a little mini game of killing the guys that you marked to extend the timer of your active ability, plus one or two other gimmicks that create a positive feedback loop. This makes the moment to moment decision making far more interesting in a fight, but it's a shame how boring a lot of the game can be otherwise.
Tales from the Borderlands is probably the only truly standout writing in the series.
Borderlands 3 is one I seemingly enjoy more than most people. The villains are terrible, I'm sure we all agree, but what's important to me about the writing in this series is that it has personality more than anything else. I'm not really expecting to hear a ton of great jokes, though I'll admit I consider the part with Ice T in the body of a teddy bear to be pretty damn funny. The mini game that I noticed in Pre-Sequel that creates a positive feedback loop? It's kicked into overdrive here. Building out my skill tree is so much better and more interesting than in its predecessors, and there's yet another major upgrade to game feel over 2 and Pre-Sequel. The decision making in each fight is all about that feedback loop rather than just mindlessly shooting until health bars deplete. I really enjoyed this game. I'm somewhat new to the loot game genre in general, but I have finished Titan Quest before this series, and this positive feedback loop seems to be a relatively recent innovation in the genre; maybe around Diablo 3? I took a brief walk through some other games and couldn't find anything like it.
New Tales from the Borderlands should have been thrown right in the garbage. It is the worst writing in the series by far.
Borderlands 4, I have yet to finish, but I'm probably 3/4 of the way through, and this time I've got a co-op partner. It stands on the shoulders of all the improvements in 3 and adds some new movement stuff as well as some subtle changes to the general design of classes. I once again play a gadget class, but even though my class was functionally nerfed, the way they did it made it more interesting to play. Even with a performance patch, the game still runs pretty shit, but I'm having a good time. The open world may actually be a detriment compared to the old way the game did things, but not so much that it's a huge drag.
If I'm picking favorites, at this point, it's a tough call between 3 and 4.