this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
418 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

77090 readers
2002 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alias_qr_rainmaker@lemmy.world 36 points 18 hours ago (36 children)

300 billion on OpenAI? Why? LLMs in general are trash, but ChatGPT isn't even the best LLM

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 17 points 17 hours ago (12 children)

GPT goes beyond chat, copilot code generation is also based on that. They also have generative visual stuff, like Sora.

Then there is brand recognition I guess, tech bros and finance bros seem to love OpenAI.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 28 points 17 hours ago (9 children)

Brand recognition cannot be overstated.

If there was a better-than-YouTube alternative right now, YouTube would still dominate.

If there was a phone OS superior to Android and iOS, they would both still dominate.

If there was a search engine that worked far better than Google, Google would still dominate.

The average person won't look into LLM reasoning benchmarks. They'll just use the one they know, ChatGPT.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think openAI is as well-known a Google.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

ChatGPT might be, which is the point.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)