this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
1098 points (99.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

27782 readers
1462 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the player can always choose not to play, though

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's a big company. Someone's going to play.

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip -2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, everyone should be evil at all times because otherwise someone else might out-evil you.

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

No. That putting the onus of change on individuals is a losing proposition. The incentives have to change or no number of good people will fix it. I hear the French have had very effective solutions in the past.

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

That's just repeating the same thing: you think life being shitty is a reason to be evil, and someone not you has to make life less shitty before being evil is no longer acceptable. I disagree.

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

You seem to believe that I think it a justification for evil. I do not, people should not do such things and they are shitty people for doing them.

I'm saying that the idea of some good people doing the right thing fixing the problem is naive and doomed to failure and a real solution to the problem has to be bigger than the lazy "just no one be evil" proposition you seem into to champion.

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Where on earth am I championing that as a solution?

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

My mistake. I believed you to be proposing a solution to the evil proposed. Not idly judging people with no meaningful contribution toward making things better.

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Also not whats happening but that's fine

I do find it funny, though, that you think judgement is not a meaningful contribution as if that's not how the vast majority of change happens.

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I'm curious how you'd characterize yourself then

It's not a meaningful contribution. Judging someone in person, sure. Judging someone when you have a platform people pay attention to, yeah. Random comment on Lemmy? No one gives a shit. I fully recognize my own pointlessness in all this, especially this far down in the comments.

[–] uncouple9831@lemmy.zip 2 points 19 hours ago

I said you shouldn't be evil regardless of whether someone else is evil. It's not an excuse. That's not judgement, nor is it a solution, it's me saying you have a choice and there is a clear right answer. Would you rather be Steve Bannon or not Steve Bannon?