Linux

10508 readers

969 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

139

Which Desktop Environment Do Arch Linux Users Prefer (linuxiac.com)

submitted 2 days ago by cm0002@literature.cafe to c/linux@programming.dev

60 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Arch Linux’s pkgstats data provides one of the few large-scale, opt-in snapshots of how real users configure their systems. While not a perfect census (participation is voluntary), the long-running dataset offers a clear picture of how desktop environment and window managers’ preferences have shifted across more than a decade.

At the same time, the data (to some extent) also reflects a broader trend for one key reason: as you know, a default Arch installation gives you only a base system, and you build everything else according to your own needs and tastes. In other words, there’s no predefined desktop environment that users are locked into, unlike most other distributions.

That means these statistics give us a very accurate look at which desktop environments and window managers Arch users actually choose to install and use. But enough talk, let’s move on to the data.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 85 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

the KDE Plasma desktop at 38.36%, nearly doubling the share of GNOME, which sits at 19.84%

Then xfce at ~11% and cinnamon, mate, etc. to round it out.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That feels about right. I know that when I go to set up a desktop system anymore, KDE is usually my default go to. It just works and doesn't tell me no for the few customizations that I want to make. XFCE and the others are absolutely vital for lower power systems. But if you want a low-friction daily driver with plenty nice to haves and easily replicable, it's hard to beat KDE.

[–] flameleaf@programming.dev 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Xfce is very replicable. Moving my install to a new system usually involves little more than copying the config files between home directories.

[–] vaionko@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Does XFCE do Wayland yet?

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

Sort of.

Everything is Wayland compatible but there is no XFWM for Wayland. So, you use a Wayland compositor like LabWC with the rest of XFCE running on top of it. This is the default XFCE config on SUSE Leap for example.

XFCE is not quite as far along on portal support as GNOME or KDE though. Depending on your use case, you may still prefer running on Xorg.

You can run the XFCE apps on any Wayland desktop.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 1 points 2 days ago

Oh absolutely, it's just missing some of the integration and features that KDE provides. I was speaking more of KDE in terms of hyperland or sway. Granted, it's just copying over configuration files after you've futzed around getting things exactly how you want. Though that's a bit much for me. Typically with KDE, I just set it to dark mode and that's largely it.

[–] nul9o9@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

KDE has too much going on for me. I like Cinnamon for everyday use.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

You mean like whiz bang zoom distractions or just a lot of stuff to download if you do a full install whether or not you're going to use all the different KDE apps.

[–] nul9o9@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah. All of the stuff i don't use but sits there.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 7 points 2 days ago

Fair enough. Though if you are comfortable in Linux. I can recommend Garuda's KDE lite iso. Plasma, SSDM, and just enough other bits to get to the desktop. Missing a lot of other bits some would consider necessary. But it's all just a pacman or yay away. No discover or most of the other KDE apps unless you ask for them. Definitely not for the terminal fearing crowd. But a bit less friction than vanilla arch.