30
Labeling dissent as terrorism: New US domestic terrorism priorities raise constitutional alarms
(theconversation.com)
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
No memes/pics of text
Post news related to the United States.
That was the concern cool headed ppl had, when they warned terrorists should not have special extra laws, but regular laws like murder or possession of destructive devices should be enough to go after them.
The term, origninally meant to describe ppl instilling terror to manipulate others, was already vague and has been diluted even more over the years.