this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
798 points (99.4% liked)

PC Gaming

12841 readers
225 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
798
Rockstar co-founder [Dan Houser] compares AI to 'mad cow disease,' and says the execs pushing it aren't 'fully-rounded humans' (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 3 days ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
119 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait, are you not aware what fallacy you are committing?

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Strawman is arguing against a different argument than the one you are presenting.

I'm saying you're not presenting an argument at all.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cool. My argument is Dan Houser exploited employees when he worked at RGS.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

  1. That's a statement, not an argument. If you're going to start citing fallacies then I'm going to start expecting properly formed arguments.

  2. That statement seems to be based exclusively on him being a union buster, despite the union busting happening 5 years after he left.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Reread my first post.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, I did. It said:

came to this thread exactly to make fun of this “fully-rounded labour exploiter”

So you're asserting that he exploited labour. Presumably in a way that is beyond the labour exploitation inherent in capitalism. Further up the page, in a different thread, you also said:

If some of these 35 visa dependent worked for more than 9 years, I am pretty sure he was there when they were exploited to work there. There’s no indication that these workers have less than a 5 year tenure.

Ok, so it sounds to me like you're asserting that he exploited them. How, exactly? Are you claiming the act of being employed on a foreign worker visa is itself exploitation? Because genuinely, unless the answer to that question is "yes", I cannot understand what the basis of your claim is. And I think that's probably the problem @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca is having, too.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 0 points 3 hours ago

Then go back to how the fear of deportation gets exploited in the UK, that even the video explains.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

So he’s going to rehire the visa dependent labourers RG fired?

That's neither a statement nor an argument, and is complete nonsense.