this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
750 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

68131 readers
3327 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
750
Microsoft's many Outlooks are confusing users and employees (www.theregister.com)
submitted 1 week ago by tinosaurier@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
187 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] myliltoehurts@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm in the same shoes about new job having to use teams and I wildly disagree. It is awful.

The best part of it is the noise cancellation on the microphone in calls seem pretty good and having a chat created for meetings is a good integration. BUT..

  • voice quality significantly decreases as soon as it's more than 2 participants.. you can clearly tell the difference as soon as a 3rd member is invited.
  • annotating on the screen share is extremely useful in slack (not sure if zoom has it too), not a thing I could find in teams
  • the channels Vs chats separation in the UI is just weird
  • the chats don't have threads.. that's such a strong feature to contain conversations. I know the channels kinda serve this purpose but it feels weird to use them and closer to sending an email or posting on a forum than directly talking to someone (with having to write a title and bring presented in 1-2 messages per screen due to the size

Compared to zoom, I guess it's not a big deal really. I'd prefer zoom but it's oh well. Compared to slack (which has it's own set of problems, but still) however it seems like a pile of shit in my opinion.

[–] jackalope@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Teams has live annotations, it's under accessibility settings.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

Are you thinking of live captions?

Annotation is on the sharing toolbar (full screen share only, not a window only share).

[–] superkret@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why is it under accessibility settings, though?
It's not an accessibility setting!

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

Its not, AFAIK. I think they are thinking of live captions.

Annotation is on the sharing toolbar, usable with full screen share only.

[–] myliltoehurts@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Thank you, I'll give it a try tomorrow.