this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
444 points (92.5% liked)

Science Memes

17442 readers
3451 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 64 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (4 children)

Presuming PEMDAS is our order of operations and the 5 next to the parentheses indicates multiplication...

2+5(8-5) -> 2+5(3) -> 2+15=17

Other than adding a multiplication indicator next to the left parentheses for clarification (I believe it's * for programming and text chat purposes, a miniature "x" or dot for pen and paper/traditional calculators), this seems fine, yeah.

...I worry about how many people may not understand how to solve equations like these.

[–] ftbd@feddit.org 15 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

That's not even an equation, just basic arithmetic

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Fair enough, I've heard "math problem" and "math equation" used interchangeably.

Also you would be surprised how many people do not know basic algebra, at least in the US rofl

[–] upandatom@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You. You are one of them bc you do not know what an equation is.

There is no algebra here. This is arithmetic.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

When I made my example, I used an algebraic expression, but yeah, the original question was arithmetic, sorry. Not very good at explaining things XD

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Technically not algebra, right? Algebra is where you move things around and solve for variables, and that kind of thing. This is just arithmetic.

[–] ftbd@feddit.org 3 points 4 hours ago

You're right, that's what I meant. Fixed it, thanks!

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

Algebra has horrible syntax. Way too much implications.

[–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

While I never failed a math class, I also never went past high school. When would your presumptions NOT be true?

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Some forms of programming syntax, although there are the fringe cases where an equation (or function in programming) is represented by a symbol in conjunction with a parentheses input.

For example:

y(x) = 2*x+3

5+y(1) = 10, as 1 is substituted in for x in the prior equation.

[–] TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

And in some languages a number can be used as a name of a variable or a function, so it can be anything really

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

Not in most programming languages, though. You cannot start names with a number. Unless you're using some strange character that merely looks like a number, anyways. Programming with unicode can get weird but generally works without issue these days.

[–] moriquende@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Wouldn't we just assume function expressions are always "in parenthesis"? Then it's just a substitution and no rules were changed.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 hours ago

Multiplication sign is not required in situations like this. Same with unknowns - you don't have to write 2*x, you just write 2x.