this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
115 points (98.3% liked)

Boycott US

1703 readers
483 users here now

Overview:

The community dedicated to boycotting the US until they stop fascism, restore full democracy and start following international law.

Americans have a moral obligation to resist Donald Trump and project 2025 at every turn.

America is a flawed democracy currently being ruled by oligarchs. Stop the backslide! Dont let America become the next Hungary.

America needs to challenge the court rulings of citizens united v. fec and shelby county v. holder, protect the media, implement independent district drawing, and the single transferable vote so they don't end up having people stay home in life-changing elections because they cannot vote for their favourite candidate.

Join 50501.chat to fight back!


Related communities:

Boycott:!buycanadian@lemmy.ca

!buyeuropean@feddit.uk

!boycott@lemmy.sdf.org

!boycottchina@sopuli.xyz

Activism:!antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world

!petitions@lemmy.ca

!palestine@lemmy.dbzer0.com

!protest@lemmy.world

!israelicrimes@lemmy.world

!patriotsforprogress@lemmy.ca

!goodsuniteus@lemmy.ca


founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm boycotting YouTube primarily because of their recent human right censorship against Palestine. But I'd generally like to reduce YouTube's dominance in the streaming space, even if it means supporting a few alternative US-based platforms like Nebula, though obviously PeerTube would be ideal.

Edit: The comments here mention that it would be good to tie the email to monetization, so I'll also be mentioning my support on Patreon in future emails.

Here's the kind of email I'm sending to my favourite creators. You can usually find their email in their channel bio.

Subject: Please consider alternative video platforms

Hello <First Name/Channel Name>,

I'm writing to ask you to please consider uploading your videos to alternative streaming platforms, in addition to, not instead of, YouTube.

I've personally started to move away from YouTube because . Here's another creator who also recently wrote about their reasons for moving off the platform: https://joshgriffiths.site/youtube-is-awful-im-not-posting-there-anymore/

I'm currently consuming video content on instead of YouTube.

<INSERT reasons I'm a fan>. I would love to continue watching your content on any other platform, and I'm sure others would appreciate the option to do so as well.

Cheers,

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wonder if some kind of pledge system would work. Similar to Patreon, but instead of paying immediately or paying monthly, you simply make a pledge that if such-and-such creator starts uploading content to such-and-such free platform, then your pledge for $x amount goes through (either monthly or one-time). There's no actual money changing hands or any actual commitment to do so, until and unless the creator in question comes onboard. Sort of like a bug bounty, multiple people could make individual pledges to build up a pot of money, that the creator could then cash in. I can see some avenues for potential abuse, and of course people can just cancel once "mission accomplished", and you've got to expect some level of that happening but assuming creators and their community have a good and supportive relationship and really are trying to support each other I don't really see that being too much of an actual concern.

We need something that helps make the case to creators that there is a real market for this, that there is a path to being compensated for their work, and that those parts of their community that are interested in this will still help support them. It doesn't even necessarily have to be directly competitive with Youtube, at this point, we're not going to collect millions of dollars. But it shows that there is potential money being left on the table, and even if it's only a little bit of money, it's not much work for a little bit of extra money, and the creator will ultimately have to decide whether that work is worth the extra money.

Right now, there's no guarantee at all, and in fact there usually is no financial benefit. They're just guessing whether there might be some money down the road for them on alternative platforms, and that's a pretty tough sell for anybody, nevermind somebody making millions already.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

This has been tried more than a few times in the past, usually in regard to textual and graphical content. It's widely known that advertisers are ready to pay at least double what the end users do, even compared to loyal audience of existing projects like on Patreon — let alone people randomly coming across the content.

[–] tpyo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That's like a reverse gofundme/kickstart with an escrow. Money held by a reputable 3rd party and if either side falls through the money goes back to the original holders

I don't want to pay monthly for someone to produce a variable number of videos, or even pay to subscribe to a whole platform to be distributed and support content I would not like to support financially. But I could very realistically consider how much I'd be willing to pay for one of their videos

A creator like Technology Connections? 100% willing to put money on the table to show there's an audience for the video. I'd be willing to pay less for a video from a streamer who plays games and puts out a video a day. They both bring entertainment value but also the production value and informational content is vastly different

I was interested so I looked into it:

collapsed inline media

From https://support.patreon.com/hc/en-us/articles/209777053-How-to-bill-members-customers

alt text"Per Creation was our first-ever billing model. Based on a “choose what you pay model,” you can create differently priced tiers, however, paid content is shared with all members. To bill members, you must designate which posts you want us to charge for. We create pending bills for your active members when the designated posts are published. Pending bills begin to process at approximately 12:00 am PT on the 1st of the month or when a member cancels. Members can set a monthly maximum

Members subscribed to a creator who bills per creation can set a monthly maximum of posts to support in a given month – this ensures that members aren’t charged more than they can agree to. A member’s monthly max does not impact their membership access."

Seems like that's what patreon was originally intended for, but they've deprecated that feature

A lot of creators have turned to merch which I also don't really want to buy, unless it's practical like a tool because I don't like wearing branded or logod things and have no need for knickknacks (stickers are an exception but they go on water bottles). Besides, the markup is ridiculous for very basic commodities

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

And this is why anything well fail. We don't want to pay.