Technology

I would have to look into the actual patent and file wrapper, but presumably it didn't cover just any rounding of rectangular corners, but as you said, a defined range.

Where bad patents get through prosecution, they are problematic, be they design patents or utility patents, but design patents in general are not even a blip on the radar of what needs to be fixed in our IP system imo. As a general rule of thumb, they are in fact fairly narrow. Meanwhile, pharma patents very much need focused and thoughtful revisions, and IP around software needs to be reworked from the ground up basically, creating special rules for patents and dropping the legislatively declared copyright framework entirely. The problem is that reporting on IP is fucking awful so people say things like "ohmyglob this design patents doesn't even have real claims" even though that's literally how they are structured and enforcing the right requires a pretty intensive investigation of the drawings and line patterns therein.

But, sure, I'll give that maybe Apple's design patent in this case was overly broad. I'm not particularly interested in defending Apple's IP.