this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
917 points (98.9% liked)

memes

18171 readers
2017 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Crowd-sourcing the collection of data in a controlled, natural fashion through a non-scientist user is likely a lot more valuable and realistic than observing or collecting data about non-wild Pokemon in a laboratory, by themselves in the wild, or through other known resources.

If you didn't organically and intimately interact with a Pokemon without bias/filtering the situation through the lens of science, how can you truly claim any understanding?

From the user's pespective, the lack of available data by default ensures that the user collects the best data, even if it does briefly explain the Pokemon upon observation - likely to serve as a warning of potential danger or to provide a brief explanation to avoid user bias to appearances.

[–] msage@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Aren't most pokemon already caught?

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

And studied too, but the dataset and scientific understanding of most Pokemon is still mostly incomplete. There is a lot of data that can still be garnered from handing out the Pokedex and encouraging users to catch and interact with Pokemon.

It's assumed that the Pokedex gathers some level of information autonomously on the interactions between trainers and the Pokemon they encounter and catch. The 6 Pokemon limit and sending excess Pokemon to the lab is likely another way to enable further research, with a steady supply of new subjects caught and interacted with in a specific, organic, and non-biased manner.

Instead of being taught about specific Pokemon prior to going out on their journey, trainers are taught about how to battle and catch Pokemon - the full breadth of literature could be sought out by them, but they are encouraged and incentivized to just go out into the world and explore.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think the six pokemon limit was just because the most popular belt style could hold 6 pokeballs on it.

-total fan theory

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

It's a regulation thing for Trainers and the League, normal people don't have to worry about it.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Just as stylistic choices for the anime could be considered, it'd also be fair to point out that a lot of the universe was designed in line with the RPG elements of the games - and 6 was the maximum amount that made sense on the small Game Boy screens.

I'm definitely going further to rationalize everything in-universe here than I ever have in my head and everything just came out naturally with no prior thought or exposure to other fan theory.

Really everything I posted is wild speculation, but it's a fun exercise to try to make sense of how the world in Pokemon works according to the anime and games. Not many fantasy universes are arguably akin to a utopia like Pokemon, but still have darker elements at play - with real world parallels if you look closely enough.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, absolutely 6 was because of the game boy limitation, but in universe I think coming up with the wackiest of reasons is great. Sort of like the 'ash is in a coma' one.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Huh, never heard that one. I love it 😂

Thanks for sharing!

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, god. That's like the original pokemon horror meme that I remember from 4chan. It's a really fun ride.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

THANK YOU for sharing this that was an awesome read

[–] msage@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

I also meant that you don't '''interact''' with wild pokemon most of the time.