this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
609 points (98.7% liked)

World News

50886 readers
1927 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Why doesn't Canada design and build its own fighter jet?

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 12 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think I can understate just how ridiculously expensive it is to start up your own jet fighting industry from basically scratch.

In the entire world, there are only 5 countries that produce fighter jets. USA, Sweden, France, China, Russia.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 13 hours ago

Look at Sweden over here punching above its weight class!

(going strictly by population size)

[–] phx@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, that's kinda like asking your mechanic neighbor "why don't you design and build your own car". Sure with enough time and money somebody could do this but it's likely to cost more, take longer, and have issues that an experienced producer has already come across and accounted for.

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It requires a massive investment in research and development of advanced aerodynamics, material science, supply chain, skilled mechanics, etc. You just don't pop out a plane from a group of engineers like we did during WW1. Creating a fighter jet that is capable enough to defend against today's adversaries will require a couple decades of investment to start from scratch. And yes I know you probably think that we can just use the knowledge already available from previous fighter jet programs like older American jets but even if they had de-classified designs they still don't have the supply chain and technical experts to pull it off in a few years.

[–] commander@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 42 minutes ago)

I don't think 20 years is enough especially for countries without the experience to fall back on. Not counting licensed builds. Engines and materials science. Also all the software. Digital and analog instruments. Modern fighters operate in connection with ground data links, satellite data links, other partner aircraft data links. All incredibly expensive and time consuming to develop

Countries with experience in Europe are all trying to partner up because of the financial costs and different part specialities for a 6th gen fighter and mockups make them look more like they'd be a gen 5.5 and they're pretty much all targeting ~2035 operationally when serious planning started between 2015-2020. I would not bet on any of the european gen 5+ being operationally ready for serial production by 2035.

[–] uhmbah@lemmy.ca 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

We tried once. Our government lacks vision sometimes.

Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow

[–] Pogbom@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

We should bring back the program! And in the name of true Canadian patriotism, I vote we call it the Avro Lavigne.

[–] treesquid@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Giant waste of money. Much smarter to buy a product someone else already wasted all the money to develop. Current-generation fighter jets are incredibly complex, Russia can't even figure out how to mass-produce one at all, even before the sanctions, and they're a very militarized state. Why spend 5x as much to develop something worse than what they can just buy?

[–] thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

What Canada really needs is a massive drone program. Drones from the size of a 747 to the size of a dime, and everything inbetween. The entire Russia-Ukraine war is a drone war.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 21 hours ago

Why dump more resources into something, that you don't need to, because there's a very serviceable option already prepped for sale?

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago

Why redesign the wheel when we can build the wheels our allies designed? And I don't mean our former allies to the south. I wouldn't want to import Gripens, but it would be fantastic if we started building them here

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Will require a lot of research and developement and spending and i am not ready to sacrifice services for it