RetroGaming

25686 readers

270 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

Be kind.
No spam, AI slop, or soliciting for money.
No racism or other bigotry allowed.
Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Xylinna@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

gts@lemmy.world

242

Zork I, Zork II and Zork III are now officially open source (www.gamingonlinux.com)

submitted 22 hours ago by homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world to c/retrogaming@lemmy.world

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://no.lastname.nz/post/1917886

Microsoft announced today that they're preserving a bit of history here - with Zork I, Zork II, and Zork III now officially and clearly open source. The source has been around for a while but now it's all proper.

From the announcement they said:

Today, we’re preserving a cornerstone of gaming history that is near and dear to our hearts. Together, Microsoft’s Open Source Programs Office (OSPO), Team Xbox, and Activision are making Zork I, Zork II, and Zork III available under the MIT License. Our goal is simple: to place historically important code in the hands of students, teachers, and developers so they can study it, learn from it, and, perhaps most importantly, play it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

By following the links in the article

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Sorry, didn't realize only an excerpt was posted here. That's on me.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe it's lazy, but I always ask for people to post things in the comments that are in the article, so I don't have to read the article.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Or maybe...it's Maybelline???

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

Yes that's it :D

[–] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I understand if the article is long or convoluted and you just need a short summary but even refusing to click the link and do a quick check is lazy AF and should not be encouraged. Or at least use AI for that.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Holy fuck, I'm not using AI for that shit.

A lot of times people are happy to share stuff in the comments. I do it myself for articles I'm actually interested in reading. It's part of the human connection that makes the internet a interesting place to be, not an AI hellscape.

[–] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 hours ago

It’s like going to a store and asking a random person nearby to pick out the item you want, which you are fully capable of reaching yourself, while you keep standing around and do nothing. Great human interaction.