politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
This story is getting fishyer by the minute. First Trump wants files released, then House overwhelmingly votes to release it, than Senate votes unanimously to release it....
They either A: scrubbed any conservative loyalist from anything they will release, or B: will indefinitely stall it with some bullshit excuse that they fabricated.
It’s clear that he was terrified of them being released in an un-redacted state. They have been all over the map on this subject, contradicting themselves at every turn. Denying, acknowledging, saying it’s a tool used by the left, but only the left are guilty in the files, etc… It could not be more clear what the implications are should the raw content go public.
Based on the calendar they dragged it out so he could pocket veto it.
I get the feeling redacting things will backfire in a spectacular way. I hope they do it, and I hope I'm right in thinking a lot of copies exist.
Almost like the files have changed?
They did say they had more than 1000 agents working on it months ago so I'm sure they've been working on edits
Trump called on the DOJ to investigate others in the Epstein files four days ago. Bondi now only has to say that the files are being used in an open investigation and can't be released at this time. This is the usual protocol for active investigations. Trump will then say that his hands are tied - he wants to release the files but the DOJ won't let him.
This is similar to what he did with his personal tax information before and during his first term. He said, I'm being audited by the IRS, and they won't allow me to release my taxes until the audit is complete. This allowed him to say, 'I want to show you my taxes but the IRS won't let me.'
He wants you to know that he is transparent and honest and trying to do the right thing but there are powerful forces working against him. Poor Donald.
Except that's a lie - an investigation by the IRS does NOT prevent you from releasing tax documents. Not even by tradition.
It's absolute nonsense.
It doesn't have to be true, it just has to convince his base and that's a low bar.
The problem is then it goes to the courts, and the courts do discovery. Then it's in the news. Again.
He's floundering.
Only if they ever finish their investigation.
In between screaming about inventing water and endorsing the murder of a journalist, trump changed his tactic to supporting the release of the files. So no republicans are going to oppose that.
Most likely the documents are modified. The good news is that there are plenty of third parties who have seen it as part of investigations. The questions will be if they decide to say anything AND if "fake news" works.
I... am not optimistic.
In addition to all the other reasons, I think the plan is just to pretend not to care.
Don Jr did something similar a few years back, that lead to the meme/quote, "I…worked on this story for a year…and…he just…he tweeted it out."
It seemed to work for him.
The fish you're smelling is rotting from the head.
I'm glad some of us are suspicious.
Almost the entire Republican party has been doing everything they can to cover for trump, then all of the sudden, this? All Republicans except one, 427-1? And trump says he'll sign it?
This is a fucking clown show.
The moment it becomes clear it’s going to pass, even a complete moron knows they shouldn’t be a “no” in the voting record. If there’s even a small chance of scattered shitstorms, that’s a risk with no upside.
Someone tell Louisiana congressman Glen Clay Higgins.