this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
223 points (99.6% liked)

News

33218 readers
2307 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Isn't California's map dependent on the Texas one going into effect? That was the original wording at least back when it was first introduced.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Isn’t California’s map dependent on the Texas one going into effect?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_California_Proposition_50

The specific text of the Proposition is

Authorizes Temporary Changes to Congressional District Maps in Response to Texas' Partisan Redistricting. Legislative Constitutional Amendment

There is no trigger tied to any action by the Texas redistricting committee. However, prior to Democrats putting the amendment on the California ballot..

On August 11, 2025, Newsom sent a letter to Donald Trump, stating that California would pause any mid-decade redistricting effort if other states called off their efforts. Two days later, Newsom announced that the deadline had passed and he would move forward with his own redistricting effort.

Now that the law has passed with overwhelming support (64/35 on final count), the map that was drafted by the independent bipartisan California Citizens Redistricting Commission is in effect going into 2026. This court decision has no effect on the California ballot amendment results or the enforcement of the new maps.

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

That language was removed, but you're right it was there initially. I think they removed the language to be able to respond if several other states combined also redistricted.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Yes. CA is basically responding to neutralize Texas. Ditto with this case. The GOP is trying to sue to top CA’s neutralization effort, and they’re claiming that CA’s very political gerrymander is secretly racist. In response, Dems are basically issuing the exact same racial gerrymander case in TX.

The one big difference is that CA’s voters are on record for supporting this. TX politicians are doing this without the consent of the people.

[–] MagosInformaticus@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It is stated to be in response to Texas, but the amended constitution as far as I can see doesn't use language about it being conditional on Texas' plan happening.

In response to the congressional redistricting in Texas in 2025 (...) the single-member districts for Congress reflected in Assembly Bill 604 (...) shall temporarily be used for every congressional election for a term of office commencing on or after the date this subdivision becomes operative

It's just that the legislature's map shall be used for elections between the proposition's passage and 2031's regularly scheduled redistricting.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

The verbiage in prop 50 that limited action based on Texas outcomes of implementing their maps was removed before Newsom's signature.

For now, at least, California's actions will continue to move forward.

I'd say don't count Texas out yet.