this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
488 points (99.4% liked)
Fediverse
37846 readers
232 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
read https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2025/11/my-next-chapter-with-mastodon/ and https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2025/11/the-future-is-ours-to-build-together/
Thank you for sharing
That's nice of him to acknowledge that.
Eugen has always seemed pretty clear-eyed about this kind of thing.
I don't think so. He often hold down PRs and when push them almost all the times makes sure that they wont be compatible with the majority of activtypub implementations.
That may have been some time ago? The team has been larger than just Eugen for quite a while now. In terms of "won't be compatible with the majority of AP implementations", is there a specific PR that has been changed to make something incompatible? I'm not sure I understand what you are describing. I'd love to know where we can improve, here.
Groups
Mastodon doesn't have groups?
"This kind of thing" being big picture dynamics of how to run a social media project.
I've also had a mastodon PR stall, but I think they get so many, many with competing demands, and have so few staff, that it's not really surprising that it's a bit mess on that front...
I love and hate how Eugen starts this whole project, leads it into being something truly unique and wonderful that directly challenges some of the most evil and wealthy people on the planet, sets up institutional guardrails to make sure it will not be corrupted by any one individual gone mad with power, gives away his position after 10 years once he's sure the organization is in good hands, and then concludes in reflection that he does not "have the right personality" for running a project like this.
I hope it has not been to hard for him, and that he'll look back at it all as a positive experience in spite of the negative interactions. I don't think any sane person has a personality that is "right" for the kind of abuse public figures receive on the internet. But from the perspective of Mastodon and the Fediverse, it seems pretty clear that he was exactly the right type of personality for the job—including by stepping down when the time felt right.
I get it and don't hate it. If one of my projects took off like that and gained traction the absolute LAST thing I'd want to be is CEO of the whole damn thing. That's just not who I am. I'd hope I'd be able to find and hand it off to someone more qualified for that position. So I totally get where Eugen is coming from as I would have done the exact same thing.
What I hate about it is that this unwillingness to be in a position of power is so correlated with actually being suited for it.
100% this.
I was on a non profit board where the founder realized he wasn't the right person for the job after 20 years of growing the org. It finally got to a point that he felt like the growth was beyond what he ever imagined or wanted.
He was, on every metric, very successful. He grew the org from nothing, got millions of dollars in donations, amassed a huge base, and no one would have thought different if he just kept going.
I remember sitting down with him one-on-one and asked him why. He thought about it for a minute and said, "It's time for someone to make it even better."
Looking back, I think I see the exhaustion. To constantly innovate, to push people forward, to push the org, the mission....it was all one person at a time. He reached a point in both age and in life that it just wasn't something he could keep doing.
He loved the mission so much he knew it deserved better.
If that isn't leadership, I don't know what is.
Everybody switched to BlueSky, not Mastodon. So, I feel like this whole project has been a failure, especially in the marketing dept.
BlueSky barely got started in Feb, and people immediately jumped ship from Twitter by the millions. Mastodon started nine years ago, and people hardly know what it is.
Bluesky hardly challenges the establishment as far as I can see, they're just more venture capitalists waiting to enshittify.
Doesn't matter. If they haven't convinced people to switch to their platform, they haven't solved the problem of transforming the medium.
How is Bluesky nowadays? Seems very quiet the last time I checked
I see Bluesky handles more than Twitter handles nowadays, even among popular streamers, YouTubers, whoever. And I can't remember the last time I've seen a Mastodon handle.
Everyone who was on Twitter that couldn't handle X moved, it's hopping, their algorithm is as good at discovery as Reddit or Twitter. A great deal of my social network that was on facebook moved right over.
Interesting, I guess it's language dependent, my main social circle doesn't speak English.
that would make sense
That first post is very good. I really appreciate the way he's handled the first 10 years, and I hope he has fun doing whatever he does next.