News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
They don't need the defendant to do anything to confirm they are who they are supposed to be. Where do you get this? The prosecution can provide fingerprint evidence, ID from the file, not the person... judge can ask once "are you ...". If the answer is not yes or no, he can warn them that the prosecutions evidence will be dnough if they don't answer. And if yhey still don't, just accept that evidrnce and move on. 5 minutes tops.
If they keep interrupting, move them to a room where they join by video and are muted when it isn't thier turn to speak. This "can" be done. But the judges I have knowledge don't tend to choose efficiency.
Brother I just watched a video of a sovcit saying "My name is all rights reserved" when asked.
which takes more time
which takes more time and not all courtrooms are equipped like that. Also, when it's their turn to speak, sovcits generally go on long, stupid tangeants, that delay, take time, and generally end them with them in jail for contempt in the end because the judge repeatedly told them to either plead guilty, not guilty, or no contest, that it's their only 3 options, and instead the paint chip eaters ramble on about maritime law of the moorish kings.
IDK why you defend sovcits so hard mate, are you one of them? Do you believe laws don't apply to you because you're wearing a fez or something?
You're arguments just don't hold any water. After covid nearly every court and jail has the capacity to do trial by video. Yet you think the very few who don't make it so the majority must spend hours on a 15 minute procedure. You somehow think the prosecution doesn't bring all the identification evidence to trail normally? It's all in the file. The judge simply needs to turn the page. Does that add minutes to the procedure, maybe, but not hours.
I am not defending thier courtroom behavior, I am pointing out that their are systems in place to keep the impact of their behaviour to a minimum, just because of thier egos, judges generally don't choose to use those systems. It's not an either or situation. Both parties can be the cause of the issue.
mate idk what to tell you but you can just look it up yourself and see how it happens when a sovcit is involved. There's thousands of videos on youtube.
you can put a guy in a private room and mute him when it's not his turn to talk, but when it's his turn to talk and you ask him if he understand his rights and he immediately goes and rambles about not standing under the rules of the tribunal corporation because the oath of office bonds says the judge must uphold the constitution, it's still going to take time.
But sure, it's because of the egotistical judges...
Or they end up in jail for contempt.
The constitution does not grant the right to defendants to ramble on endlessly on unrelated topics. I get it, you watched some youtube videos where the judge let them ramble and think it must be required. You shouldn't believe everything you see on youtube. It's entertainment, not facts. Sometimes it's both, but not often.
I see you haven't read the last line of my comment
Still not sure why you're siding with the single braincelled organisms but ok
Sure I did. But a judge doesn't have to hold a person in contempt if there is no value to it. So that line didn't matter. Judges have an upsurd amount of latitude on what and how they do things.