this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
-72 points (14.0% liked)

Technology

76945 readers
3312 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
-72
New battery life record: This CPU makes the best known business laptop more efficient (www.notebookcheck.net)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Brkdncr@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A comparison of Lenovo Thinkpad t14 over the years and how the new lunar lake cpu stacks up.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Lunar lake is x86-64 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Lake

Intel said that with Lunar Lake, it aimed to "bust the myth that [x86] can't be as efficient" as ARM.[3] Analysis of tests performed on Lunar Lake CPUs available at market launch indicated that, although their multi-core performance was not particularly good under full load, their efficiency under everyday use was good, even if the ARM competition still has its advantages.[4]

[โ€“] mehdi_benadel@lemmy.balamb.fr 1 points 2 days ago

That was a joke ๐Ÿ˜‚ I'm not seriously thinking they put ARM instructions in a x86 processor, though they might've tried to replicate the optimisations that led to less power usage in those RISC processors (I still can't get why RISC CPUs are more power efficient honestly, it seems counter intuitive, now again it might just be because of overengineering).