politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
And yet everyone voted for a rich, racist, rapist, pedophile who can barely speak and also supports genocide anyway.
~30% of the adult population voted for said rapist
You need to add the people who couldn't be arsed opposing him.
Or the people who had to work, or couldn't wait for 3h at their neighborhood polling place, or have disengaged from politics for any number of reasons, or were educated here and earnestly didnt know how important this last election was.
Low voter turnout is an inevitable symptom of a corrupt system.
Or maybe whose vote didn't get counted. I think the jury is still out on that right now.
Black people's mail in ballots were rejected at a rate nine times greater than white people's. You can't tell me there wasn't a ton of ratfuckery in play.
That part is not because of the white rapist, but because of the bad candidate that were forced on them as an alternative.
Yeah no shit - for half of our voters, those things are all selling points. If we run a man who's an absolute piece of shit against a woman who's less so, but still very much a piece of shit, the man will win every time. As I said, sexism is definitely a factor.
If we run a man who's an absolute piece of shit against a woman who isn't a piece of shit... who fuckin knows: we haven't tried that. But Harris's odds seemed pretty solid until she started publicly supporting Israel's genocide on Gaza: so she lost a hefty chunk of support from the half of voters who are turned off by evil behavior; meanwhile the bigot's popularity with bigoted voters remained unsurprisingly steady.
My point is that the people who try to justify not voting for Harris due to her support of genocide achieved nothing.
Do you seriously think Trump gave less weapons to Israel? Do you think he did a better job of keeping a muzzle on Bibi?
They might think they didn't sully their soul, but they did. Refusing to choose the lesser of two evils isn't a moral win. It's just allowing the worse evil to win.
That's not the point I'm making - the people who chose not to vote over Harris's comments are fucking morons. They share responsibility for Trump's victory and everything he's done since.
But the time to look past Harris's comments, shut our mouths, and vote strategically for her was during the general. The election is over, and there is no longer reason to defend her, or contrast her against Trump. She isn't a lesser evil anymore.
And there's the core of my point: looking at her objectively, she is evil. She stands right alongside the voters who opted out in culpability for Trump's victory and enabling the current dismal state of our country.
That's why I think the whole "America isn't ready for a women" spiel is BS. Both of the women we've run recently were fucking horrible candidates: but even so they lost by a narrow enough margin that blaming the outcome on the contents of their pants is a failure to consider the other variables at play.
If we ran a woman who was actually likeable, doesn't have a history full of scandals, and doesn't come out in the 11th hour of the general to say something detrimental like support for genocide... then that woman will win.
Well... K? You can keep getting mad about an overwhelming and likely irrelevant minority, but can you keep it for when it's actually relevant?