this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
524 points (96.5% liked)

Not The Onion

18625 readers
1250 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Lower 6 figures today is middle class. Or at least what middle class buying power was 40 years ago.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You can’t afford to buy a single family home on $100k/yr in my area. So I’m not sure it really meets the classic definition of middle class anymore.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Middle class didn’t mean a big McMansion or desirable area. It meant a modest house in a small lot in a boring suburb of someplace like Detroit where you’d work for Ford or something.

Our ideas of what kind of house we should have is really distorted. It’s like pickup trucks. What was considered an everyday pickup 40 years ago was 1/3rd the size of the behemoths available today, and of course today’s trucks cost $80,000 compared to the $6,500 of something like a ‘85 Toyota Pickup ($20k in today dollars).

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Every 1950s 1k square foot track home in my area is 1 million or more no matter how dilapidated within 2hours of the metro

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

“…high paying jobs are.”

And that is the problem.

Capitalism run amok with the increasing need to push the line higher and maximize profits resulting in gluttony eating up all the spare money in a market.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Low 6 figure is the minimum required to have a middle class lifestyle for one person (not a family) in California. And when I say middle class lifestyle, I mean not having to worry about bills, but still not able to buy a house or a new car without decades of saving or massive debt. Maybe you can afford a vacation once a year if you haven’t had any unexpected medical problems.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Especially when you factor in the cost of living in places where $100k jobs are to be found. “Six figures” may sound like a fortune if you’re sitting in rural Ohio but it’s little more than a decent wage in Seattle.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah. The problem is that the goalposts keep getting pushed away faster than income is keeping up. Someone might have what is considered a good paying job, but the buying power for major purchases like cars and homes keeps taking hits. On top of that the bills get steeper and steeper. Six figures should be a fortune.