436
Meeting in the middle means shifting the goal posts until we're all knee deep in right wing bullshit
(piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
436 points (98.7% liked)
Political Memes
9816 readers
2371 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I found myself unconsciously drifting away from people who are mentally stuck behind the definition of words. I didn't realize what I was doing or why I was feeling safety in isolating myself for the longest time.
People who are so heavily invested in the definitions of words rarely have good intentions.
It never really made much sense to me. Words are all made up and are in constant change from one time period to the next. Each generation has their own words and what it means to them.
I think subconsciously I realized that people obessed with defining words were attempting to assert power or dominance over me or my interests. That's why I pushed back in my own way. By living a life that can't be defined and cutting those weirdos out of my life.
After a weirdo dies, what did all that time spent fighting about the definition of a word archive? Maybe we can ask Charlie.
Words are the basis for all communication if you cannot communicate clearly what you want from me don’t talk to me.
I think people who don’t care about the definition of words to a group are lazy, selfish, and ussually trying to manipulate me by slapping me around with double speak.
It's not about not caring about the definition of words. It's about not doing that at the expense of caring about meaning.
Yes exactly. It’s nothing to do with the definition. It’s about how people try to re-define words to mean other shit. Not that we shouldn’t care about the definition of the word. If someone is trying to define something so we can all communicate on a level playing field with words we all understand then good. Otherwise it’s a bad faith argument. People need to be able to come to a common understanding together in a conversation.
Oh yeah, 100%
I see what you're saying. There's a huge difference between snidely asking "What is a woman?" so you can sit there and pick apart every definition they try to give, versus saying "When you use the term 'woman' here, what do you mean by it?" so you can understand their definition and move forward.
Oh yeah? Define definition of a word!
It depends on what the meaning of the word “is” is.
I believe it's about being which brings us to the question about being or not being
Something to do with oral sex 🤷🏻
D:
Some people just like clear communication and don't find that idea stupid, weird, evil, or controlling. I actually would say that opposing clear communication so hard comes from a need to manipulate people and conversations to be whatever you want them to be. I get that words are slippery, they definitely are, but you shouldn't misuse them and then run scared if someone calls you on it.
Okay, but the context of this meme is people making arguments that "children" shouldn't be protected from pedophiles because they are potentially biologically "capable" of bearing young.
Every adult person on some basic level does know the difference between biological capability, age and status as an adult.
To obfuscate that in a search for "clarity" only allows wrongdoers to work their way out of bad situations.
Of course there may be some fringe circumstance that is so fucked, confusing and bizarre that it may in fact need some kind of understanding deeper than a basic moral or legal understanding. However rich, powerful, informed, adults intentionally engaging with minors in sexual, intimate and private ways is not one of them.
I understand you yourself are not attempting to protect pedophiles, but please understand that you need to specifically make that clear before you make such a comment or argument. That discourse is valid, but needs to be properly contextualized.
The user I responded to changed the subject in my mind. Neither of us referenced the original post other than we talked about definitions. The original post is so obviously a bad faith argument coming from the Nazi that it would've never occurred to me anyone needs to point it out. This isn't Twitter where 70% of users are nazis.
It's still possible to communicate clearly and not get dragged down with getting lost in the excess of words from so many niche or specific topics of human interests.
Personally I choose to speak using words that are more common, simpler and broader. The purpose of that for me is to be understood by as many people as possible. To be understood by people of many ages or English skill level. This generally involves me using more words to describe what it is that I want to say or express without the need to condense meaning into words I have trouble defining because it's outside of my personal interests.
Since I want to be understood by so many people, it means that many more people can hold me up to my word. That I can be called out by anyone, young or old, English as a first language or not and so on.
When I'm around people who talk like a dictionary, using all these words that seem definable but leaves me confused and trying to fill in the blanks in a conversation, I'm left with questions. Can they define all those words? But more importantly, who are they trying to talk to? Me? Or their preferred group of like-minded people?
There was a time before written language where language was continued through culture, tradition, story and possibly many other ways. This current experience isn't the one and only way to experience life.
The ones who spend a large amount of personal energy fighting to define words will have spent a large amount of their limited time alive fighting to define words. They could have tried building community, or creating art or maybe just existing in the moment and being happy with the beauty that surrounds them. And then they, just like us, will all die. Life will continue on and the definition of words will continue to flow, change, evolve or die like so much of human culture and activity.
I'd need an example to get what you mean. Because part of me thinks you're describing something I relate to, another part of me thinks you are talking about doing that incredibly annoying thing where you consistently use a word incorrectly and when it's pointed out you seemed to be saying something very different from what you meant, you blame the other party and get annoyed. I know people who do this, and it's quite annoying because I'm actually spending effort trying to translate instead of instantly understanding, had they spoken with more consideration for their audience.
I think my personal usage of the word 'queer' might be a good example to help describe what I mean.
I personally have a strong dislike for labels. Often people label me as a quick way to describe a list of traits they think I am. Often I do not neatly fit that list of traits which ends up with the other person upset that I am not neatly categorized and predictable.
However, as much as I hate labels, I still need to find community in this modern world. Talking with my therapist, we both agreed that 'queer' is probably the best compromise. It's nothing too specific and it's broad enough to be overall inclusive. I did not want to meet a specific group. Not gay, not bi, not poly, not trans, or any specific group. I wanted to meet all of these people in a general, inclusive space. In my area, the word queer happens to attract that diverse crowd I want to surrounded by.
I've been around by the type of people misinterpret my words my whole life. That's why I choose to speak and type in the way that I do. I'm attempting to remove ambiguity. By removing thier tool of defining words as a weapon, it reveals that they can't really defend themselves or their awful hidden views.
Why do you assume that most people are using words as weapons? I was honestly relating to what you wrote until the last paragraph. Especially about "awful hidden views". In my experience the worst possible way to communicate is to take a tiny statement that does indicate anything bad in particular and assume it actually does. This is why all the infighting on the left happens imo. "They only said/think that because [leap to horrible thing that no one said]"
I'm curious though, who is questioning your use of queer? That sounds exactly like the modern definition of the word to me. Not sure I've noticed anyone disputing that.
Am I assuming most people are using words as a weapon?
Did I say people were questioning my use of the word queer?
I'm discussing a common manipulation tactic that's often performed which is happening in this meme. Something often used to derail an argument by forcing people to waste time talking about the definition of words rather than continuing a conversation about concepts as a whole.
Manipulator's to me are like magicians, they hate when people talk about the tools of their trade. And I love talking about the tools of a manipulators trade. This just so happened to be a meme about a manipulators tool.
I asked for an example of people getting annoyed about you using a word wrong and that's what you gave. This conversation has been confusing, but I don't think we actually disagree after all.
You're only thinking of the manipulators and those who ~~relish~~ enjoy control over others.
You imply that the time could have been better spent in service of art or the community.
I ask you then, have you thought of the clerks? The assistants? Art? What of the writers?
Language can be used to control or manipulate yes. But before those purposes came, came the need for it to first exist, as a tool to forge connection.
To describe the sunset, give voice to the grief, and exclaim the joyous cry.
It is. Language is powerful, and you can't bow out, because you only ever have to win with a casual on looker to have tremendous impact on a small group. Heck, this even works for larger groups.
Wording is a big part of that.
Hi! I am your opposite. I hate when people mangle meaning of words with no reason altogether. Create new ones all you want, I am all behind it. But leave the old ones be and use them correctly.
Constant meddling, changing and pushing around of words makes them useless in communication and, in case of words having a weight attached to them, makes them hollow. It's one thing to use custom meaning in your circle, another altogether to try to force it upon the world - in a way, becoming what you hate, someone forcing their definition.
For example, overuse of the word "Nazi" pretty much made it worthless. Today if people get called nazi...nobody cares. Word got overused, it's meaning thinned.
What I hate about MAGA tho is that we create new words for new phenomena like transsexual and they behave as if it wasn't valid. It's not words they protect - they protect their worldview and frame it as defending language.
Gonna dig my grave but I do consider female and transfemale different. But especially if they had surgery they are both women. We never specified women fully, did we? Traditionally it's just a person with tits and vagina. And I hate mental gymnastics MAGA go to to try and exclude people who literally went through invasive medical procedure to fit into what their brain deemed always natural. This is defending meaning of words vs. defending your worldview and framing it as defending words.
Also I may be autistic cuz I cling to rules too much xD
Disagree that Nazi lost meaning. It is very accurate when describing today's "conservative" Americans. The term "conservative" isn't even remotely as accurate as Nazi is.
You're speaking a language made of words that have been mangled and mutated with no rhyme or reason, with significantly less logic behind it than other languages.
Or does it just mean that Nazis are everywhere, and it's more important than ever to call it out?
Most Nazis were not Hermann Göring, they were surprisingly normal people who enabled atrocities to happen. That's the part people need to recognize.
Yeah, but we are, at least should be, better than our ancestors at making it sensible. We can expand vocab for new words, we don't need to destroy the meaning behind already existing ones.